Home transfusion: three decades of practice at a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUNDHospital at Home (HH) provides specialized care at the patients' homes. Keeping patients in familial surroundings can result in better outcomes reducing readmission to hospital, mortality, and costs of care. Home transfusion (HT) can be a key element in HH management but is scarcely deployed due to concerns about safety and cost. We have reviewed our HT practice to assess its feasibility and safety. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSWe prospectively reviewed data collected from 1985 to 2015, focusing specially on feasibility and procedural safety, looking for adverse events of transfusion. We also assessed the situation in similar hospitals in Spain with a survey about their practice. RESULTSA total of 613 patients received 2260 blood components in 2126 transfusion episodes. A total of 93% patients received fewer than 10 transfusions. Most patients were treated for blood diseases (32%) or cancers (20%). The rate of adverse effects was 2.68% and decreased significantly with time. Fever was the most common adverse reaction. Patients who received transfusion of more than one blood product in a day were at higher risk of adverse events. No errors or near-miss events were detected, and no patient had to be readmitted to hospital for this cause. The survey on HT practices in similar hospitals showed great variation in practice. CONCLUSIONHT is feasible, sustainable, and safe, when performed on selected patients by dedicated HH units with well-trained staff, under specific protocols.