Spatial prediction and mapping of water quality of Owabi reservoir from satellite imageries and machine learning models

被引:19
作者
Adusei, Yvonne Yeboah [1 ]
Quaye-Ballard, Jonathan [2 ]
Adjaottor, Albert Amatey [1 ]
Mensah, Alex Appiah [3 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Engn, Dept Mat Engn, Private Mail Bag,Univ Post Off, Kumasi, Ghana
[2] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Engn, Dept Geomatic Engn, Private Mail Bag,Univ Post Off, Kumasi, Ghana
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Fac Forest Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management, Skogsmarksgrand, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Water quality; Optical satellite image data; Machine learning models; Owabi Reservoir;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.06.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Estimation and mapping of surface water quality are vital for the planning and sustainable management of inland reservoirs. The study aimed at retrieving and mapping water quality parameters (WQPs) of Owabi Dam reservoir from Sentinel-2 (S2) and Landsat 8 (L8) satellite data, using random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. Water samples from 45 systematic plots were analysed for pH, turbidity, alkalinity, total dissolved solids and dissolved oxygen. The performances of all three models were compared in terms of adjusted coefficient of determination (R-2.adj), and the root mean square error (RMSE) using repeated k-fold cross-validation procedure. To determine the status of water quality, pixel-level predictions were used to compute model-assisted estimates of WQPs and compared with reference values from the World Health Organization. Generally, all three models produced more accurate results for S2 compared to L8. On average, the inter-sensor relative efficiency showed that S2 outperformed L8 by 67% in retrieving WQPs of the Owabi Dam reservoir. S2 gave the highest accuracy for RF (R-2.adj = 95-99%, RMSE = 0.02-3.03) and least for MLR (R-2.adj = 55-9 1%, RMSE = 0.03-3.14). Compared to RF, SVM showed similar results for S2 but with slightly higher RMSEs (0.03-3.99). The estimated pH (7.06), total dissolved solids (39.19 mg/L) and alkalinity (179.60 mg/L) were within acceptable limits, except for turbidity (33.49 mg/L) which exceeded the reference thresholds. The S2 and RF models are recommended for the monitoring of surface water quality of the Owabi Dam reservoir. (c) 2021 National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 833
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Role of statistical remote sensing for Inland water quality parameters prediction [J].
Abdelmalik, K. W. .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2018, 21 (02) :193-200
[2]   Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data [J].
Abdi, Abdulhakim Mohamed .
GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 57 (01) :1-20
[3]   Changes in water quality in the Owabi water treatment plant in Ghana [J].
Akoto O. ;
Gyamfi O. ;
Darko G. ;
Barnes V.R. .
Applied Water Science, 2017, 7 (01) :175-186
[4]  
Akoto Osei, 2014, Lakes & Reservoirs Research and Management, V19, P174, DOI 10.1111/lre.12066
[5]  
Akoto OT., 2008, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, V2, P354, DOI DOI 10.4314/AJEST.V2I11
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality
[7]  
Badu M, 2013, AM J SCI IND RES SCI, V4, P337, DOI [10.5251/ajsir.2013.4.4.337.343, DOI 10.5251/AJSIR.2013.4.4.337.343]
[8]   Assessment of the quality of the Owabi reservoir and its tributaries [J].
Boadi, Nathaniel Owusu ;
Borquaye, Lawrence Sheringham ;
Darko, Godfred ;
Wemegah, David Dotse ;
Agorsor, Dodzi ;
Akrofi, And Randy .
COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2018, 4 (01)
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]   Estimation of water quality parameters using Landsat 8 images: application to Playa Colorada Bay, Sinaloa, Mexico [J].
González-Márquez L.C. ;
Torres-Bejarano F.M. ;
Rodríguez-Cuevas C. ;
Torregroza-Espinosa A.C. ;
Sandoval-Romero J.A. .
Applied Geomatics, 2018, 10 (2) :147-158