Statewide Evaluation of Washington's State Innovation Model Initiative: A Mixed-Methods Approach

被引:2
|
作者
Grembowski, David [1 ]
Ingraham, Bailey [1 ]
Wood, Suzanne [1 ]
Coe, Norma B. [2 ]
Fishman, Paul [1 ]
Conrad, Douglas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Hans Rosling Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv, 3980 15th Ave NE,UW Box 351621, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Hlth Policy Div, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
State Innovation Model; SIM; Washington; health policy; statewide system transformation; complex intervention; PAYMENT REFORM; HEALTH; CARE; FRAMEWORK; SERVICES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1089/pop.2020.0374
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Washington State Innovation Model (SIM) $65 million Test Award from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation is a statewide intervention expected to improve population health, quality of care, and cost growth through 4 initiatives in 2016-2018: (1) regional accountable communities of health linking health and social services to address local needs; (2) a practice transformation support hub; (3) four value-based payment reform pilot projects mainly in state employee and Medicaid populations; and (4) data and analytic infrastructure development to support system transformation with common measures. A mixed-methods study design and data from the 2013-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Surveys are used to estimate whether SIM resulted in changes in access to care, health behaviors, and health status in Washington's adult population. Semi-structured qualitative interviews also were conducted to assess stakeholder perceptions of SIM performance. SIM may have reduced binge drinking, but no effects were detected for heavy drinking, physical activity, smoking, having a regular doctor checkup, unmet health care needs, and fair or poor health status. Complex interventions, such as SIM, may have unintended consequences. SIM was associated unexpectedly with increased unhealthy days, but whether the association was related to the Initiative or other factors is unclear. Over 3 years, stakeholders generally agreed that SIM was implemented successfully and increased Washington's readiness for system transformation but had not yet produced expected outcomes, partly because SIM had not spread statewide. Stakeholders perceived that scaling up SIM statewide takes time to achieve and remains challenging.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 737
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] State-Level Evaluation of Washington's State Innovation Models (SIM) Initiative
    Grembowski, David
    Conrad, Douglas
    Naranjo, Diana
    Wood, Suzanne
    Zhou, Lingmei
    Banks, Jordan
    Coe, Norma B.
    Kwan-Gett, Tao
    Baseman, Janet
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2021, 32 (02) : 862 - 891
  • [2] RE-AIM Evaluation Plan for Washington State Innovation Models Project
    Grembowski, David
    Conrad, Douglas A.
    Naranjo, Diana
    Wood, Suzanne
    Coe, Norma B.
    Kwan-Gett, Tao
    Baseman, Janet
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 29 (02) : 81 - 94
  • [3] A suicide prevention initiative at a jumping site: A mixed-methods evaluation
    Ross, Victoria
    Koo, Yu Wen
    Kolves, Kairi
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 19
  • [4] Perspectives on certification of community health workers: A statewide mixed-methods assessment in Nebraska
    Ern, Jessica
    Chaidez, Virginia
    Trout, Kate E. E.
    Karsting, Kathy
    Su, Dejun
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 40 (04) : 535 - 542
  • [5] Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial
    Pittalis, Chiara
    Brugha, Ruairi
    Crispino, Gloria
    Bijlmakers, Leon
    Mwapasa, Gerald
    Lavy, Chris
    Le, Grace
    Cheelo, Mweene
    Kachimba, John
    Borgstein, Eric
    Mkandawire, Nyengo
    Juma, Adinan
    Marealle, Paul
    Chilonga, Kondo
    Gajewski, Jakub
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [6] A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Palliative Needs of Parkinson's Patients
    Prizer, Lindsay P.
    Gay, Jennifer L.
    Wilson, Mark G.
    Emerson, Kerstin G.
    Glass, Anne P.
    Miyasaki, Janis M.
    Perkins, Molly M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2020, 39 (08) : 834 - 845
  • [7] A mixed-methods evaluation of an urban Aboriginal diabetes lifestyle program
    Power, Tamara
    East, Leah
    Gao, Yu
    Usher, Kim
    Jackson, Debra
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 45 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [8] Understanding delays to parathyroidectomy: A mixed-methods approach
    Chen, Catherine
    Li, Winnie
    Sanghavi, Kavya K.
    Lu, Jana
    Wong, Georgia
    Nijhar, Sukhjeevan
    Snee, Isabel
    McGowan, Tanner
    Kim, Margot
    Dabbas, Mai Raseem
    Li, Karen
    Felger, Erin A.
    Carroll, Nancy M.
    Rosen, Jennifer E.
    Lai, Victoria
    SURGERY, 2024, 176 (04) : 1090 - 1097
  • [9] Evaluation of the Implementation Process of a Family Systems Nursing Approach in Home Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pusa, Susanna
    Isaksson, Ulf
    Sundin, Karin
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2021, 27 (03) : 235 - 249
  • [10] The Linkages Between Reimbursement and Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Zwaagstra Salvado, Ellen
    van Elten, Hilco J.
    van Raaij, Erik M.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9