Complications of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:90
作者
Master, Daniel L. [2 ]
Hanson, Pamela R. [3 ]
Gosain, Arun K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Mandible; distraction osteogenesis; complications; surgical planning; distraction vector; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; GRADUAL DISTRACTION; RECONSTRUCTION; MICROSOMIA; STABILITY; FIXATION; CHILDREN; DEVICE; VECTOR;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ecc6e5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mandibular hypoplasia, retrognathia, and micrognathia are commonly encountered problems in pediatric plastic surgery. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a relatively simple technique that allows for correction of the deformity with minimal morbidity. However, MDO can lead to a wide variety of complications. Methods: The PubMed database was queried for all articles describing complications of MDO. Each article was then reviewed, and relevant data were extracted and compiled. Finally, several case reports are presented to illustrate poignant examples of complications. Results: Complications of MDO include relapse (64.8% incidence), tooth injury (22.5%), hypertrophic scarring (15.6%), nerve injury (11.4%), infection (9.5%), inappropriate distraction vector (8.8%), device failure (7.9%), fusion error (2.4%), and temporomandibular joint injury (0.7%). Conclusions: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be associated with a wide variety of minor and major complications, but all complications can be avoided with careful planning and technique.
引用
收藏
页码:1565 / 1570
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children
    Carls, FR
    Sailer, HF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 26 (04) : 197 - 208
  • [2] A potential complication with an extraoral distractor for mandible lengthening: Facial nerve paralysis
    Civelek, B
    Karamursel, S
    Ozdil, K
    Celebioglu, S
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (02) : 698 - 699
  • [3] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A historic perspective and future directions
    Cope, JB
    Samchukov, ML
    Cherkashin, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) : 448 - 460
  • [4] Evaluation of molar teeth and buds in patients submitted to mandible distraction: Long-term results
    Freitas, Renato da Silva
    Tolazzi, Andre R. D.
    Alonso, Nivaldo
    Cruz, Gilvani A. O.
    Busato, Luciano
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (04) : 1335 - 1342
  • [5] Fritz Michael A, 2004, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V12, P513, DOI 10.1097/01.moo.0000143979.33496.0a
  • [6] Grayson B H, 1999, Semin Orthod, V5, P9, DOI 10.1016/S1073-8746(99)80038-3
  • [7] Vector of device placement and trajectory of mandibular distraction
    Grayson, BH
    McCormick, S
    Santiago, PE
    McCarthy, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (06) : 473 - 480
  • [8] Gürsoy S, 2008, ORTHOD CRANIOFAC RES, V11, P57, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00415.x
  • [9] Hanson P R, 1999, Semin Orthod, V5, P25, DOI 10.1016/S1073-8746(99)80039-5
  • [10] Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age
    Hollier, LH
    Kim, JH
    Grayson, B
    McCarthy, JG
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (05) : 1361 - 1370