On the Cognitive Effectiveness of Routing Symbols in Process Modeling Languages

被引:0
作者
Figl, Kathrin [1 ]
Mendling, Jan [2 ]
Strembeck, Mark [1 ]
Recker, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Humboldt Univ, Berlin 10099, Germany
[3] Queensland Univ Technolo, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
来源
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS | 2010年 / 47卷
关键词
Process modeling; cognitive analysis; UML; YAWL; BPMN; EPCs; OR-JOINS; LOAD; WORKFLOWS; WORDS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Process models provide visual support for analyzing and improving complex organizational processes. In this paper, we discuss differences of process modeling languages using cognitive effectiveness considerations, to make statements about the ease of use and quality of user experience. Aspects of cognitive effectiveness are of importance for learning a modeling language, creating models, and understanding models. We identify the criteria representational clarity, perceptual discriminability, perceptual immediacy, visual expressiveness, and graphic parsimony to compare and assess the cognitive effectiveness of different modeling languages. We apply these criteria in an analysis of the routing elements of UML Activity Diagrams, YAWL, BPMN, and EPCs, to uncover their relative strengths and weaknesses from a quality of user experience perspective. We draw conclusions that are relevant to the usability of these languages in business process modeling projects.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Level Process Modeling-An Experimental Investigation of the Cognitive Effectiveness of Process Landscape Diagrams
    Polancic, Gregor
    Kous, Katja
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [2] Modelling and Enforcement of Inter-Process Dependencies with Business Process Modelling Languages
    Grossmann, Georg
    Schrefl, Michael
    Stumptner, Markus
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 42 (04): : 289 - 322
  • [3] Software process modeling languages: A systematic literature review
    Garcia-Borgonon, L.
    Barcelona, M. A.
    Garcia-Garcia, J. A.
    Alba, M.
    Escalona, M. J.
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [4] A Comparison of Metric-Based and Empirical Approaches for Cognitive Analysis of Modeling Languages
    Kamandi, Ali
    Habibi, Jafar
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2009, 90 (03) : 337 - 352
  • [5] A Comparison of Six UML-Based Languages for Software Process Modeling
    Bendraou, Reda
    Jezequel, Jean-Marc
    Gervais, Marie-Pierre
    Blanc, Xavier
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2010, 36 (05) : 662 - 675
  • [6] COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN PERCEIVING LANGUAGES
    Shuliak, Svitlana
    Korolova, Nataliia
    Chumakova, Kseniia
    Wei, Zhang
    Medvid, Nataliia
    AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (02): : 94 - 98
  • [7] Interdisciplinary Assessment of Process Modeling Languages Applicable for Small to Medium-sized Enterprises
    Nielen, Alexander
    Jeske, Tim
    Schlick, Christopher M.
    Arning, Katrin
    Ziefle, Martina
    IMCIC 2010: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON COMPLEXITY, INFORMATICS AND CYBERNETICS, VOL II, 2010, : 47 - 52
  • [8] Visual Modeling Languages in Patient Pathways:Scoping Review
    Bogale, Binyam
    Vesinurm, Mart
    Lillrank, Paul
    Celius, Elisabeth Gulowsen
    Halvorsrud, Ragnhild
    INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 13
  • [9] ONTOLOGY-VERSUS PATTERN-BASED EVALUATION OF PROCESS MODELING LANGUAGES: A COMPARISON
    Recker, Jan
    Rosemann, Michael
    Krogstie, John
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 20 : 774 - 799
  • [10] THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYMBOLS AND WORDS TO CONVEY PHOTOCOPIER FUNCTIONS
    HOWARD, C
    OBOYLE, MW
    EASTMAN, V
    ANDRE, T
    MOTOYAMA, T
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1991, 22 (04) : 218 - 224