Solving Solar-Wind Power Station Location Problem Using an Extended Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) Technique with Interval Neutrosophic Sets

被引:46
作者
Nie, Ru-xin [1 ]
Wang, Jian-qiang [1 ]
Zhang, Hong-yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2017年 / 9卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); interval neutrosophic sets (INSs); weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS); integrated criteria weight information; solar-wind power station location selection; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SITE SELECTION; PLANT; GIS; OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/sym9070106
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As one of the promising renewable energy resources, solar-wind energy has increasingly become a regional engine in leading the economy and raising competitiveness. Selecting a solar-wind power station location can contribute to efficient utilization of resource and instruct long-term development of socio-economy. Since the selection procedure consists of several location alternatives and many influential criteria factors, the selection can be recognized as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. To better express multiple uncertainty information during the selection procedure, fuzzy set theory is introduced to manage that issue. Interval neutrosophic sets (INSs), which are characterized by truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership functions in the interval numbers (INs) form, are feasible in modeling more uncertainty of reality. In this paper, a newly extended weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) technique, which involves novel three procedures, is utilized to handle MCDM issues under INSs environment. Some modifications are conducted in the extended method comparing with the classical WASPAS method. The most obvious improvement of the extended method relies on that it can generate more realistic criteria weight information by an objective and subjective integrated criteria weight determination method. A case study concerning solar-wind power station location selection is implemented to demonstrate the applicability and rationality of the proposed method in practice. Its validity and feasibility are further verified by a sensitivity analysis and a comparative analysis. These analyses effectively reveal that the extended WASPAS technique can well match the reality and appropriately handle the solar-wind power station location selection problem.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Multicriteria decision analysis based on analytic hierarchy process in GIS environment for siting nuclear power plant in Egypt
    Abudeif, A. M.
    Moneim, A. A. Abdel
    Farrag, A. F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 75 : 682 - 692
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, NEUTROSOPHY NEUTROSO
  • [3] MULTI-PERSON SELECTION OF THE BEST WIND TURBINE BASED ON THE MULTI-CRITERIA INTEGRATED ADDITIVE-MULTIPLICATIVE UTILITY FUNCTION
    Bagocius, Vygantas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 20 (04) : 590 - 599
  • [4] GARAGE LOCATION SELECTION FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSE BY WASPAS-SVNS METHOD
    Bausys, Romualdas
    Juodagalviene, Birute
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 23 (03) : 421 - 429
  • [5] Broumi S., 2015, J NEW THEORY, V2, P62
  • [6] Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2014, 25 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [7] A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzy setting
    Chen, Zhiping
    Yang, Wei
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (09) : 4424 - 4437
  • [8] Chi P, 2013, NEUTROSOPHIC SETS SY, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.571231
  • [9] DiugaitTumnien R., 2014, Engineering Structures and Technologies, V6, P33
  • [10] Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II
    Dong Jun
    Feng Tian-tian
    Yang Yi-sheng
    Ma Yu
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 35 : 194 - 204