共 87 条
Chicago Classification update (V4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility
被引:30
作者:
Gyawali, C. Prakash
[1
]
Zerbib, Frank
[2
]
Bhatia, Shobna
[3
]
Cisternas, Daniel
[4
]
Coss-Adame, Enrique
[5
,6
]
Lazarescu, Adriana
[7
]
Pohl, Daniel
[8
]
Yadlapati, Rena
[9
]
Penagini, Roberto
[10
]
Pandolfino, John
[11
]
机构:
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, 60 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8124, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Dept Gastroenterol, Ctr Medicochirurg Magellan, Hop Haut Leveque,CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
[3] Sir HN Reliance Fdn Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] Univ Desarrollo, Clin Alemana Santiago, Fac Med, Santiago, Chile
[5] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Gastroenterol, Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
[6] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Lab Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
[7] Univ Alberta, Div Gastroenterol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Hosp Zurich, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Esophageal Dis, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[10] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[11] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词:
absent contractility;
high‐
resolution manometry;
ineffective esophageal motility;
D O I:
10.1111/nmo.14134
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Esophageal hypomotility disorders manifest with abnormal esophageal body contraction vigor, breaks in peristaltic integrity, or failure of peristalsis in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 recognizes two hypomotility disorders, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and absent contractility, while fragmented peristalsis has been incorporated into the IEM definition. Updated criteria for ineffective swallows consist of weak esophageal body contraction vigor measured using distal contractile integral (DCI, 100-450 mmHg center dot cm center dot s), transition zone defects >5 cm measured using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour, or failure of peristalsis (DCI < 100 mmHg center dot cm center dot s). More than 70% ineffective swallows and/or >= 50% failed swallows are required for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. When the diagnosis is inconclusive (50%-70% ineffective swallows), supplementary evidence from multiple rapid swallows (absence of contraction reserve), barium radiography (abnormal bolus clearance), or HRM with impedance (abnormal bolus clearance) could support a diagnosis of IEM. Absent contractility requires 100% failed peristalsis, consistent with previous versions of the classification. Consideration needs to be given for the possibility of achalasia in absent contractility with dysphagia despite normal IRP, and alternate complementary tests (including timed upright barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe) are recommended to confirm or refute the presence of achalasia. Future research to quantify esophageal bolus retention on stationary HRM with impedance and to understand contraction vigor thresholds that predict bolus clearance will provide further refinement to diagnostic criteria for esophageal hypomotility disorders in future iterations of the Chicago Classification.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文