Exploring the relationship between communication risk perception and communication portfolio

被引:14
作者
Lee, Chei Sian [1 ]
Watson-Manheim, Mary Beth
Ramaprasad, Arkalgud
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, Div Informat Studies, Singapore 637718, Singapore
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Informat & Decis Sci, Coll Business Adm, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
communication; information and communication technology; risk perception;
D O I
10.1109/TPC.2007.897608
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of information communication technologies (ICT) over the past decade, the nature of how organization members communicate has changed, becoming far more complex and challenging. Communication risks brought about by technology-mediated communication can sometimes be detrimental to the overall organizational function and success. We classify these communication risks into three types: reception, understanding, and action risks. We propose the notion of COMMUNICATION PORTFOLIO which refers to a single ICT or a specific combination of ICTs that can be used to manage any perceived risk of communication. Specifically, this study aims to examine the relationship between perceived risks (i.e., risk of reception, risk of understanding, and risk of action) in the communication. process and the dimensions (i.e., size, content, and structuring mechanism) of the communication portfolio usedfor communication. We also identify communication riskfactors that may accentuate the different types of risks. We develop a communication risk Perceptionframework to illustrate the relationship between the communication risk factors, the different types of communication risks, and the communication portfolio. Finally, we illustrate how the communication risk perceptionframework can be applied in a real-life natural setting by using the shuttle Challenger incident as an example.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 146
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] TOWARDS A BEHAVIORAL-THEORY OF COMMUNICATION
    ACKOFF, RL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1958, 4 (03) : 218 - 234
  • [2] ADLER J, 1988, NEWSWEEK, V112, P28
  • [3] [Anonymous], TEXTUAL DYNAMICS HIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES SOCIALL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, NO DOWNLINK DRAMATIC
  • [6] Armstrong D.J., 2002, Distributed Work, P167, DOI DOI 10.1037/10189-007
  • [7] Bauer R., 1967, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, P287
  • [8] Virtual teams and multiple media:: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals
    Belanger, France
    Watson-Manheim, Mary Beth
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2006, 15 (04) : 299 - 321
  • [9] BELL T, 1989, IEEE SPECTR, V26, P42
  • [10] THE FATAL FLAW IN FLIGHT 51-L
    BELL, TE
    ESCH, K
    [J]. IEEE SPECTRUM, 1987, 24 (02) : 36 - 36