Artificial Intelligence in Brazilian Judicial Branch

被引：0
作者：
da Silva Dantas, Frederico Widson [1 ,2 ]
Braz, Graciela Farias [3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Fed Alagoas, Fac Direito Alagoas FDA, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil
[2] FDA UFAL, Programa Posgrad Direito, Mestrado Direito, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Alagoas, Direito Publ, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil
[4] Tribunal Just Estado Alagoas, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil
来源：
REVISTA JURIDICA PORTUCALENSE | 2022年
关键词：
Judicial decision-making; Artificial intelligence; Judiciary; Fundamental Rights; Procedural cooperation;
D O I：
10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne2v2)2022.ic-04
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
The Brazilian Judicial Branch has been experiencing the effects of the digital transformation, following the enlarged use of information technology, phenomenon that tends to be improved by investments made in new automation tools and development of artificial intelligence systems, to assist judicial decision-making. In Brazil, the ongoing debate over the risks and benefits of artificial intelligence is current, with three different bills introduced in Congress, meanwhile, the National Justice Counsel (CNJ) has issued a regulation adopting the European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. While the artificial intelligence legal framework is still being debated in Congress, there are no obstacles for the use of artificial intelligence systems in judicial decision-making, especially since the Brazilian Judiciary employs the artificial intelligence technology as a management tool to rationalize the treatment of repetitive demands, in which there is no fact review and the adversarial principal is mitigated, taking into account reasons pertinent to legal certainty and isonomy, solution compatible with the cooperation model, brought in by the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure.
引用
收藏
页码：51 / 76
页数：26
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ANGWIN Julia, 2016, M BIAS THERES SOFTWA
  • [2] ARAS Vladimir., 2020, INTELIGENCIA ARTIFIC, P85
  • [3] BARREIROS Lorena Miranda Santos, 2013, FUNDAMENTOS CONSTITU
  • [4] BRAGANCA Fernanda, 2019, REV SECAO JUDICIARIA, V23, P65
  • [5] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, FUT IA SIST JUD BRAS
  • [6] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, 2020, JUST NUM 2020 AN BAS
  • [7] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, 2020, RES CNJ 332 21 8 202
  • [8] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, 15 AN INF TRANSF JUD
  • [9] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, 2013, RES CNJ 185 18 12 20
  • [10] CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTICA, 2020, PAND LEV JUD AC AD T
1234