Doctoral Student Self-Assessment of Writing Development

被引:2
作者
Hunker, Diane F. [1 ]
Shellenbarger, Teresa [2 ]
Gazza, Elizabeth A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chatham Univ, Dept Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Penn, Indiana, PA USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Wilmington, Sch Nursing, Wilmington, NC USA
关键词
scholarly writing; self-assessment; DNP student; nursing education; NURSING-STUDENTS; SCHOLARLY WRITER; SKILLS; PROGRAMS; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1891/2380-9418.12.2.141
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Doctoral nursing students struggle with scholarly writing. While writing improvement strategies have been shared, few studies have used student self-assessment of evidenced-based knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) to aid with writing development. Objective: This study evaluated doctoral student self-assessment of the KSAs specific to writing at each level of nursing education and explored the association of student demographics with self-assessment results. Methods: A national sample of doctoral students completed an electronic, 35-item self-assessment. Results: Self-assessment revealed the majority of KSAs expected at the BSN, MSN, and doctoral level were being used by Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students. One doctoral level KSA did not meet the benchmark for DNP students. A positive association was noted between DNP students' self-assessment and age. Conclusions: Doctoral students reported using many of the KSAs for writing expected at each level of nursing education. Most student demographics did not appear to influence writing development. Implications for Nursing: Self-assessment was an effective way to assess student writing development. Items not meeting the performance benchmark may illuminate the need for further writing development. Faculty recommendations for using self-assessment and facilitating writing development are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ESS DOCT ED ADV NURS
[2]   Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design [J].
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) :698-712
[3]  
Brown G.T.L., 2014, Frontline Learning Research, V2, P22, DOI DOI 10.14786/FLR.V2I1.24
[4]  
Cato Mary L, 2009, Nurs Educ Perspect, V30, P105
[5]   Nursing informatics competencies: assessment of undergraduate and graduate nursing students [J].
Choi, Jeungok ;
De Martinis, Jean E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (13-14) :1970-1976
[6]  
Driscoll D. L., 2016, COMPOSITION FORUM, V34, P1
[7]  
Gadbury-Amyot Cynthia C, 2015, J Dent Hyg, V89, P357
[8]   Developing as a scholarly writer: The experience of students enrolled in a PhD in nursing program in the United States [J].
Gazza, Elizabeth A. ;
Shellenbarger, Teresa ;
Hunker, Diane F. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (03) :268-274
[9]   Facilitating Scholarly Writer Development: The Writing Scaffold [J].
Gazza, Elizabeth A. ;
Hunker, Diane F. .
NURSING FORUM, 2012, 47 (04) :278-285
[10]   Comparing student self-assessment to individualized instructor feedback [J].
Gibbs, Jennifer C. ;
Taylor, Jim D. .
ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (02) :111-123