The Effects of Similarity on Charitable Giving in Donor-Donor Dyads: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:17
作者
Tian, Yuan [1 ]
Konrath, Sara [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, XinJian Bldg,1954 Huashan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Indiana Univ, Lilly Family Sch Philanthropy, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
VOLUNTAS | 2021年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Social influence; Conformity; Charitable donations; Peer influence; Similarity; INCIDENTAL SIMILARITY; SOCIAL INFORMATION; DONATION BEHAVIOR; FIELD; ATTRACTION; IMPACT; PERCEPTION; IDENTITIES; RECIPIENT; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1007/s11266-019-00165-w
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Giving circles and alumni campaigns are popular forms of nonprofit fund-raising practice that may lead to positive peer effects that promote charitable giving among similar individuals. However, do individuals always give more in the presence of similar others? Most research finds a positive social influence among similar individuals in donor-solicitor and donor-recipient dyads. However, in donor-donor dyads, the effects of social influence on charitable giving are mixed. Individuals' giving can be positively or negatively affected by other donors' giving. This systematic literature review (35 eligible studies) investigates how individuals' charitable giving is affected by the giving of others. Its major contribution is to extend the previous literature by proposing a new mechanism of decision making in charitable giving through an important psychological construct (similarity). It also identifies five critical factors that could help to explain inconsistent findings of similarity effects on two measures of charitable giving (giving propensity and giving amount). It also contributes to identifying a literature gap, suggesting future research directions, and providing important implications to fund-raising practice.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 339
页数:24
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: Exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems [J].
Abrams, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (01) :114-128
[2]   Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica [J].
Alpizar, Francisco ;
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1047-1060
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2018
[4]  
Aristotle, 2004, Rhetoric
[5]   CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS AS INCLUDING OTHER IN THE SELF [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
TUDOR, M ;
NELSON, G .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 60 (02) :241-253
[6]   FACIAL SIMILARITY BETWEEN VOTERS AND CANDIDATES CAUSES INFLUENCE [J].
Bailenson, Jeremy N. ;
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Yee, Nick ;
Collins, Nathan A. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (05) :935-961
[7]   Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy [J].
Basil, Debra Z. ;
Ridgway, Nancy M. ;
Basil, Michael D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2008, 25 (01) :1-23
[8]   George gives to geology Jane: The name letter effect and incidental similarity cues in fundraising [J].
Bekkers, Rene .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR MARKETING, 2010, 15 (02) :172-180
[9]   A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (05) :924-973
[10]  
Booth A., 2016, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, V2nd ed.