Organizational Constraints to Adaptation: Intrafirm Asymmetry in the Locus of Coordination

被引:37
作者
Aggarwal, Vikas A. [1 ]
Wu, Brian [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
demand shock; coordination; adaptation; organization design; interdependence; dynamic environments; defense industry; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; VALUE CREATION; PRODUCT; CAPABILITIES; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COSTS; DIVERSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2014.0929
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We assemble a panel data set of firms in the U.S. defense industry between 1996 and 2006 to examine the drivers of heterogeneous incumbent firm adaptation following the industry-wide demand shock of September 11, 2001. This shock entailed not only an increase in aggregate demand but, more importantly, a shift in the relative attractiveness of individual product areas, resulting in the need for firms to reshuffle their product portfolios in response to changing demand conditions. The exogenous nature of the shock allows us to empirically identify the effect of preshock interdependence structures on postshock adaptation outcomes. We find that the locus of coordination inside a firm can explain differential postshock adaptation performance: because interdependencies spanning organizational boundaries are more difficult to manage than those contained within such boundaries, coordination across product areas creates greater adaptation challenges compared with coordination within product areas. We further investigate the moderating effects of product complementarity and organizational grouping, finding results consistent with our hypothesized mechanisms. As one of the first studies to empirically link a firm's locus of coordination with its adaptation performance, this study contributes to our understanding of the role of interdependence and organization design in dynamic environments.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 238
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[31]   Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies Between Formal and Informal Organization [J].
Gulati, Ranjay ;
Puranam, Phanish .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (02) :422-440
[32]  
GUPTA AK, 1986, ACAD MANAGE J, V29, P695, DOI 10.5465/255940
[33]   Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis [J].
Gupta, Anil K. ;
Tesluk, Paul E. ;
Taylor, M. Susan .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (06) :885-897
[34]   Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dyanamics of diversification [J].
Helfat, CE ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (13) :1217-1232
[35]   ARCHITECTURAL INNOVATION - THE RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING PRODUCT TECHNOLOGIES AND THE FAILURE OF ESTABLISHED FIRMS [J].
HENDERSON, RM ;
CLARK, KB .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :9-30
[36]   STRATEGY AND STRUCTURE IN THE MULTIPRODUCT FIRM [J].
HILL, CWL ;
HOSKISSON, RE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1987, 12 (02) :331-341
[37]  
Khandwalla P., 1977, DESIGN ORG
[38]   MANAGING A GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP MODEL: LESSONS FROM THE BOEING 787 'DREAMLINER' PROGRAM [J].
Kotha, Suresh ;
Srikanth, Kannan .
GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2013, 3 (01) :41-66
[39]   The Costs of Related Diversification: The Impact of the Core Business on the Productivity of Related Segments [J].
Kumar, M. V. Shyam .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (06) :1827-1846
[40]  
Lawrence P., 1967, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration