Organizational Constraints to Adaptation: Intrafirm Asymmetry in the Locus of Coordination

被引:37
作者
Aggarwal, Vikas A. [1 ]
Wu, Brian [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
demand shock; coordination; adaptation; organization design; interdependence; dynamic environments; defense industry; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; VALUE CREATION; PRODUCT; CAPABILITIES; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COSTS; DIVERSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2014.0929
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We assemble a panel data set of firms in the U.S. defense industry between 1996 and 2006 to examine the drivers of heterogeneous incumbent firm adaptation following the industry-wide demand shock of September 11, 2001. This shock entailed not only an increase in aggregate demand but, more importantly, a shift in the relative attractiveness of individual product areas, resulting in the need for firms to reshuffle their product portfolios in response to changing demand conditions. The exogenous nature of the shock allows us to empirically identify the effect of preshock interdependence structures on postshock adaptation outcomes. We find that the locus of coordination inside a firm can explain differential postshock adaptation performance: because interdependencies spanning organizational boundaries are more difficult to manage than those contained within such boundaries, coordination across product areas creates greater adaptation challenges compared with coordination within product areas. We further investigate the moderating effects of product complementarity and organizational grouping, finding results consistent with our hypothesized mechanisms. As one of the first studies to empirically link a firm's locus of coordination with its adaptation performance, this study contributes to our understanding of the role of interdependence and organization design in dynamic environments.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 238
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   INNOVATION - MAPPING THE WINDS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
ABERNATHY, WJ ;
CLARK, KB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (01) :3-22
[2]   Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation [J].
Adner, R ;
Levinthal, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (05) :611-628
[3]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[4]   Strategic Renewal of Organizations [J].
Agarwal, Rajshree ;
Helfat, Constance E. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (02) :281-293
[5]  
Anand J, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P99, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<99::AID-SMJ928>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-2
[7]   Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination [J].
Argyres, NS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 28 (03) :337-358
[8]  
Baldwin C.Y., 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, DOI [DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2366.001.0001, 10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001]
[9]   The Architecture of complexity [J].
Barabasi, Albert-Lashlo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2007, 27 (04) :33-42
[10]  
Benner MJ, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P703, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275206