The role of strategic innovation activities in creating Spanish agriculture companies' innovativeness

被引:5
作者
Zastempowski, Maciej [1 ]
Cyfert, Szymon [2 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Dept Enterprise Management, Fac Econ Sci & Management, Torun, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Inst Management, Poznan, Poland
来源
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA | 2022年 / 68卷 / 06期
关键词
product innovation; process innovation; R& D activities; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; IN-HOUSE; FOOD; BUSINESS; FIRMS; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.17221/66/2022-AGRICECON
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to identify strategic innovation activities that influence the product and process innovativeness of Spanish agriculture companies. From a theoretical perspective, according to the Oslo Manual, strategic innovation activities can be divided into five key groups. Based on a dataset including 874 firms covered by the 2014 edition of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), we examine the role of different forms of strategic innovation activities used for the introduction of product and process innovations. Using the logit regression model and marginal effects, we found evidence of a relationship between the strategic activities and the product and process innovations in Spanish agriculture companies. The results indicate that only one type of strategic innovation activity, i.e. in-house research and development (R&D) is a common statistically significant factor explaining the product and process innovation. In the case of the other strategic innovation activities, some differences can be found. Thus, external R&D and other activities are significant for product innovation, but not for process innovation. In turn, the acquisition of machinery, equipment, software and buildings and training for innovative activities are significant for process innovation, but not for product innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OSLO MANUAL 2018 GUI, VCuarta, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN, DOI 10.1787/A041F4EF-EN]
[2]   Innovativeness in food small business: What is its relationship with marketing? [J].
Banterle, Alessandro ;
Cavaliere, Alessia ;
Carraresi, Laura ;
Stranieri, Stefanella .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2011, 57 (10) :474-483
[3]   Opening design and innovation processes in agriculture: Insights from design and management sciences and future directions [J].
Berthet, Elsa T. ;
Hickey, Gordon M. ;
Klerkx, Laurens .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 165 :111-115
[4]   Innovation complementarities and firm growth [J].
Bianchini, Stefano ;
Pellegrino, Gabriele ;
Tamagni, Federico .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2018, 27 (04) :657-676
[5]  
Boring P, 2017, INT J TRAIN DEV, V21, P113, DOI 10.1111/ijtd.12096
[6]   Examining the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in the Canadian Food Processing Industry [J].
Brewin, Derek G. ;
Monchuk, Daniel C. ;
Partridge, Mark D. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2009, 57 (01) :75-97
[7]   External R&D and product innovation: Is over-outsourcing an issue? [J].
Carboni, Oliviero A. ;
Medda, Giuseppe .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 103
[8]   Beyond absorptive capacity: in-house R&D as a driver of innovative complementarities [J].
Catozzella, Alessandra ;
Vivarelli, Marco .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 21 (01) :39-42
[9]   Mediation effects of trust and contracts on knowledge-sharing and product innovation Evidence from the European machine tool industry [J].
Charterina, Jon ;
Landeta, Jon ;
Basterretxea, Imanol .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 21 (02) :274-293
[10]   Business services in Germany: Bridges for innovation [J].
Czarnitzki, D ;
Spielkamp, A .
SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2003, 23 (02) :1-30