Biological ensilage additives as pretreatment for maize to increase the biogas production

被引:104
|
作者
Vervaeren, H. [1 ]
Hostyn, K. [1 ]
Ghekiere, G. [2 ]
Willems, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Howest, PIH, Dept Environm Sci, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] POVLT, B-8800 Rumbeke, Belgium
关键词
Ensilage additives; Biogas; Maize; Homo-fermentative; Anaerobic digestion; FERMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS; LACTOBACILLUS-BUCHNERI; HARVEST DATE; YIELD; INOCULATION; SILAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2010.02.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several biological ensilage additives were tested on maize substrate for their effect on biogas production and preservation of ODM content. In general, the addition of some biological additives and subsequent storage for 7 weeks could enhance the biogas and biomethane production per ODM when compared to the untreated sample. A common microbial inoculent containing homo-fermentative and hetero-fermentative bacteria (Bonsilage Mais(R)), had no beneficial effect on biogas and biomethane production compared with the non-treated sample (-12.7% and -13.1% per ODM, respectively). More complex additives with hetero- and homo-fermentative activity (Silasil Energy(R)) as well as enzymes (Sil-all 4 x 4(R)) or bacteria and yeasts (Microferm(R)) did effectively increase the biogas production per ODM (respectively with 11.8, 10.1 and 14.7%). Losses in ODM content were minor in all samples. These results might indicate that more divergent biological additives involving yeasts or enzymes during ensiling are preferred as maize preservation tools for anaerobic digestion instead of a spontaneous ensilage population or to add only homo- and hetero-fermentative strains. The nature of the additive might enhance the hydrolysis step in the anaerobic digestion process by decomposing complex carbohydrate structures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2093
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extrusion as a pretreatment to increase biogas production
    Hjorth, Maibritt
    Granitz, Kay
    Adamsen, Anders P. S.
    Moller, Henrik B.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (08) : 4989 - 4994
  • [2] Ensiling of tall fescue for biogas production: Effect of storage time, additives and mechanical pretreatment
    Feng, Lu
    Kristensen, Erik Flojgaard
    Moset, Veronica
    Ward, Alastair James
    Moller, Henrik Bjarne
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 47 : 143 - 148
  • [3] Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production
    Zhong, Weizhang
    Zhang, Zhongzhi
    Luo, Yijing
    Sun, Shanshan
    Qiao, Wei
    Xiao, Meng
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (24) : 11177 - 11182
  • [4] Improving aerobic stability and biogas production of maize silage using silage additives
    Herrmann, Christiane
    Idler, Christine
    Heiermann, Monika
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 197 : 393 - 403
  • [5] Biogas production from maize hybrids
    Oslaj, Matjaz
    Mursec, Bogomir
    Vindis, Peter
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (11) : 1538 - 1545
  • [6] Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment
    Nowicka, Anna
    Zielinski, Marcin
    Debowski, Marcin
    Dudek, Magda
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (23)
  • [7] BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM FRESH MAIZE BIOMASS
    Dubrovskis, Vilis
    Plume, Imants
    Bartusevics, Janis
    Kotelenecs, Vladimirs
    9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 220 - 225
  • [8] Effect of biological pretreatment of Agropyron elongatum 'BAMAR' on biogas production by anaerobic digestion
    Lalak, Justyna
    Kasprzycka, Agnieszka
    Martyniak, Danuta
    Tys, Jerzy
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 200 : 194 - 200
  • [9] Biogas production from maize
    Bartusevics, Janis
    Gaile, Zinta
    Strikauska, Silvija
    RESEARCH FOR FUTURE OF LATVIA AGRICULTURE: FOOD, FEED, FIBER AND ENERGY, 2012, : 42 - 47
  • [10] Giant cane (Arundo donax L.) for biogas production: The effect of two ensilage methods on biomass characteristics and biogas potential
    Corno, Luca
    Pilu, Roberto
    Cantaluppi, Enrico
    Adani, Fabrizio
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 93 : 131 - 136