Analysis through thermogravimetric analyses of the impact of torrefaction processes performed under a non-oxidative atmosphere on hydrolysis lignin samples

被引:10
作者
Brillard, A. [1 ]
Trouve, G. [1 ]
Maryandyshev, P. [2 ]
Kehrli, D. [1 ]
Lyubov, V [2 ]
Brilhac, J-F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haute Alsace, Inst Rech Jean Baptiste Donnet, Lab Gest Risques & Environm EA 2334, 3bis,Rue Alfred Werner, F-68093 Mulhouse, France
[2] Northern Arctic Fed Univ, Inst Energy & Transport, Dept Ind Power Engn, Northern Dvina Embankment 17, Arkhangelsk 163002, Russia
关键词
Hydrolysis lignin; Non-oxidative torrefaction process; Thermogravimetric analysis; EIPR model; Optimal kinetic parameters; Optimal torrefaction conditions; BIOMASS TORREFACTION; WET TORREFACTION; WOODY BIOMASS; PYROLYSIS; DENSIFICATION; PRETREATMENT; ENERGY; DRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116261
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Hydrolysis lignin samples were torrefied in a fixed bed reactor under a nitrogen flow, under four different isothermal temperatures (225, 250, 275 or 300 degrees C) and during 30 or 60 min. The impact of such torrefaction conditions on the hydrolysis lignin samples was analyzed through thermogravimetric analyses performed under non-oxidative or oxidative atmospheres and under a heating rate of 5 degrees C/min. The thermogravimetric profile and the reactivity of the raw and torrefied samples were compared. The optimal values of the kinetic parameters were determined using the EIPR model, first determining the number of constituents to be considered, then their proportions applying Van Soest's protocol to the raw material and adjusting them for the torrefied samples. These values of the kinetic parameters were validated through observations of the experimental and simulated mass and mass rate curves and computations of the maximal difference between these curves. The values of the kinetic parameters did not significantly vary with the isothermal temperature or with the torrefaction residence time.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization [J].
Abbasi, Tasneem ;
Abbasi, S. A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (03) :919-937
[2]   Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [J].
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Shirley, J. E. J. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :367-380
[3]  
Adams PWR, 2014, WORLD BIOEN 2014 C 2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROCEDE BIOMASS ENSC
[5]   Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction [J].
Bach, Quang-Vu ;
Skreiberg, Oyvind .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :665-677
[6]   Dry and wet torrefaction of woody biomass - A comparative study on combustion kinetics [J].
Bach, Quang-Vu ;
Tran, Khanh-Quang .
CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 :150-155
[7]   Torrefaction of biomass: A review of production methods for biocoal from cultured and waste lignocellulosic feedstocks [J].
Barskov, Stan ;
Zappi, Mark ;
Buchireddy, Prashanth ;
Dufreche, Stephen ;
Guillory, John ;
Gang, Daniel ;
Hernandez, Rafael ;
Bajpai, Rakesh ;
Baudier, Jeff ;
Cooper, Robbyn ;
Sharp, Richard .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 142 (624-642) :624-642
[8]  
Bergman P.C., 2005, TORREFACTION BIOMASS
[9]   Improvements of global models for the determination of the kinetic parameters associated to the thermal degradation of lignocellulosic materials under low heating rates [J].
Brillard, A. ;
Brilhac, J. F. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 :1498-1509
[10]   A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications [J].
Chen, Wei-Hsin ;
Peng, Jianghong ;
Bi, Xiaotao T. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 44 :847-866