Social impact assessments: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework

被引:56
作者
Arce-Gomez, Antonio [1 ]
Donovan, Jerome D. [1 ]
Bedggood, Rowan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Business & Enterprise, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
关键词
Social impact assessment; Framework; CUMULATIVE IMPACTS; MANAGEMENT; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social Impact Assessments (SIAs) have played an increasingly important role in the conduct of planned interventions, providing proponents the capacity to assess and manage the social consequences of their activities. Whilst the SIA field has experienced significant conceptual and practical development over the last decade, efforts at consolidating this within one framework have been limited. In this paper, we incorporate this new knowledge by redeveloping and thus updating the SIA procedural framework developed by Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. In doing so, this updated procedural framework has attempted to incorporate current 'best practice' that focuses on participatory approaches to undertaking an SIA. This involved making adaptions to two steps, expansions to five steps, integration of a stronger participatory approach to six steps, and the development of a new step, Management and Evaluation reflecting moves towards ex-post use of SIA processes. It is hoped that this consolidation of the literature of a decade's worth of key findings in SEA research will lead to further efforts towards a meta-evaluation of SEA literature and a platform from which newer developments may be further investigated. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Evaluating the use of Social Impact Assessment in the context of agricultural development projects in Iran [J].
Ahmadvand, Mostafa ;
Karami, Ezatollah ;
Zamani, Gholam Hossein ;
Vanclay, Frank .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (06) :399-407
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IMPACT ASSESS PROJEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154603781766464
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, P231, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154603781766293
[5]   Comparative Case Study as Social Impact Assessment: Possibilities and Limitations for Anticipating Social Change in the Far North [J].
Asselin, Jodie ;
Parkins, John R. .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2009, 94 (03) :483-497
[6]  
Becker D. R., 2004, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V22, P177, DOI 10.3152/147154604781765932
[7]  
Becker D.R., 2003, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V23, P367, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00098-7
[8]  
Becker HA, 2003, INT HDB SOC IMP ASS
[9]   A social impact perspective on the Browse LNG Precinct strategic assessment in Western Australia [J].
Beckwith, Jo Ann .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2012, 30 (03) :189-194
[10]  
Bond A. J., 1999, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V17, P157, DOI 10.3152/147154699781767855