Subsumption Algorithms for Three-Valued Geometric Resolution

被引:2
作者
de Nivelle, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego, Inst Informat, Wroclaw, Poland
来源
AUTOMATED REASONING (IJCAR 2016) | 2016年 / 9706卷
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-40229-1_18
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In an implementation of geometric resolution, the most costly operation is subsumption (or matching): One has to decide for a three-valued, geometric formula, whether this formula is false in a given interpretation. The formula contains only atoms with variables, equality, and existential quantifiers. The interpretation contains only atoms with constants. Because the atoms have no term structure, matching for geometric resolution is a hard problem. We translate the matching problem into a generalized constraint satisfaction problem, and give an algorithm that solves it efficiently. The algorithm uses learning techniques, similar to clause learning in propositional logic. Secondly, we adapt the algorithm in such a way that it finds solutions that use a minimal subset of the interpretation. The techniques presented in this paper may have applications in constraint solving.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 272
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Automating coherent logic
    Bezem, M
    Coquand, T
    [J]. LOGIC FOR PROGRAMMING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND REASONING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3835 : 246 - 260
  • [2] de Nivelle H, 2006, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4130, P303
  • [3] Classical Logic with Partial Functions
    de Nivelle, Hans
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2011, 47 (04) : 399 - 425
  • [4] Dechter R, 2003, CONSTRAINT PROCESSIN
  • [5] deNivelle H., 2014, J LOGIC COMPUT
  • [6] deNivelle H, 2014, AUTOMATED REASONING, P71
  • [7] deNivelle H, 2006, THEOREM PROVER GEO 2
  • [8] ON THE EFFICIENCY OF SUBSUMPTION ALGORITHMS
    GOTTLOB, G
    LEITSCH, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1985, 32 (02) : 280 - 295
  • [9] Fast theta-subsumption with constraint satisfaction algorithms
    Maloberti, J
    Sebag, M
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2004, 55 (02) : 137 - 174
  • [10] Conflict-driven clause learning SAT solvers
    [J]. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl., 2009, 1 (131-153): : 131 - 153