Strategy without ontology

被引：40

作者：

Powell, TC ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Grad Sch Management, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

来源：

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | 2003年 / 24卷 / 03期

关键词：

empiricism; strategy; ontology; competitive advantage; pragmatism;

D O I：

10.1002/smj.284

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Professor Arend's critique raises fundamental epistemological issues for strategy research, particularly the concern that pragmatist philosophy forecloses access to objective truth and scientific progress. This response discusses the empiricist underpinnings of pragmatism, and addresses Professor Arend's specific concerns about the connections between competitive advantages and firm performance. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

引用

页码：285 / 291

页数：7

共 21 条

[1]

[Anonymous], FROM A LOGICAL POINT

[2]

[Anonymous], 1946, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC

[3]

[Anonymous], 1998, CULTURE VALUE

[4] Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage [J].

Arend, RJ .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (03) :279-284

[5]

DUHEM P, 1954, AIM STRUCTURE PHYSIC

[6] Competitive advantages exist: A critique of Powell [J].

Durand, R .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (09) :867-872

[7]

James W., 1878, J SPECUL PHILOS, V12, P1

[8]

James W, 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL, V2, DOI DOI 10.1037/11059-000

[9]

KINCAID H, 1996, PHILOSOPHICAL FDN SO

[10]

Kirzner I.M., 1973, COMPETITION ENTREPRE

← 1 2 3 →