Avoiding Bias in Observational Studies

被引:200
作者
Hammer, G. P. [1 ]
Prel, J. D. [2 ]
Blettner, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, IMBEI, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Mainz, Zentrum Pravent Padiatrie, Zentrum Kinder & Jugendmed, Mainz, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2009年 / 106卷 / 41期
关键词
clinical research; study; observational study; epidemiology; data analysis; RISK; EXPOSURE; ALCOHOL; CANCER; ERROR;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2009.0664
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Many questions in human health research can only be answered with observational studies. In contrast to controlled experiments or well-planned, experimental randomized clinical trials, observational studies are subject to a number of potential problems that may bias their results. Methods: Some of the more important problems affecting observational studies are described and illustrated by examples. Additional information is provided with reference to a selection of the literature. Results: Factors that may bias the results of observational studies can be broadly categorized as: selection bias resulting from the way study subjects are recruited or from differing rates of study participation depending on the subjects' cultural background, age, or socioeconomic status, information bias, measurement error, confounders, and further factors. Conclusions: Observational studies make an important contribution to medical knowledge. The main methodological problems can be avoided by careful study planning. An understanding of the potential pitfalls is important in order to critically assess relevant publications.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 668
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mendelian randomisation and the goal of inferring causation from observational studies in the vision sciences
    Plotnikov, Denis
    Guggenheim, Jeremy A.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2019, 39 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [42] Simulation of survivorship bias in observational studies on plasma to red blood cell ratios in massive transfusion for trauma
    Ho, A. M. -H.
    Dion, P. W.
    Yeung, J. H. H.
    Joynt, G. M.
    Lee, A.
    Ng, C. S. H.
    Chang, A.
    So, F. L.
    Cheung, C. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 132 - 139
  • [43] A statistic with demonstrated insensitivity to unmeasured bias for 2 x 2 x S tables in observational studies
    Rosenbaum, Paul R.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (19) : 3758 - 3771
  • [44] Bias-adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Bai, Fangfang
    Pang, Herbert
    George, Stephen L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 29 (04) : 592 - 605
  • [45] Blood glucose and lipids are associated with sarcoidosis: findings from observational and mendelian randomization studies
    Zhan, Yuan
    Zhang, Jiaheng
    Yang, Ruonan
    Deng, Zhesong
    Chen, Shanshan
    Feng, Jie
    Wu, Jixing
    Huang, Qian
    Gu, Yiya
    Xie, Jungang
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [46] Prevalence of Cancer in Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Leeaphorn, Napat
    Kue-A-Pai, Pogsathorn
    Thamcharoen, Natanong
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    Stokes, Michael B.
    Knight, Eric L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 40 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [47] Selection biases in observational studies affect associations between 'moderate' alcohol consumption and mortality
    Naimi, Timothy S.
    Stockwell, Timothy
    Zhao, Jinhui
    Xuan, Ziming
    Dangardt, Frida
    Saitz, Rich
    Liang, Wenbin
    Chikritzhs, Tanya
    ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [48] General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: observational studies with case-control design
    Martinez, Diego
    Papuzinski, Cristian
    Stojanova, Jana
    Arancibia, Marcelo
    MEDWAVE, 2019, 19 (10):
  • [49] Testing one hypothesis twice in observational studies
    Rosenbaum, P. R.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2012, 99 (04) : 763 - 774
  • [50] Registration of Observational Studies Does Not Enhance Validity
    Savitz, D. A.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 90 (05) : 646 - 648