Avoiding Bias in Observational Studies

被引:202
作者
Hammer, G. P. [1 ]
Prel, J. D. [2 ]
Blettner, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Johannes Gutenberg Univ, IMBEI, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Mainz, Zentrum Pravent Padiatrie, Zentrum Kinder & Jugendmed, Mainz, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2009年 / 106卷 / 41期
关键词
clinical research; study; observational study; epidemiology; data analysis; RISK; EXPOSURE; ALCOHOL; CANCER; ERROR;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2009.0664
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Many questions in human health research can only be answered with observational studies. In contrast to controlled experiments or well-planned, experimental randomized clinical trials, observational studies are subject to a number of potential problems that may bias their results. Methods: Some of the more important problems affecting observational studies are described and illustrated by examples. Additional information is provided with reference to a selection of the literature. Results: Factors that may bias the results of observational studies can be broadly categorized as: selection bias resulting from the way study subjects are recruited or from differing rates of study participation depending on the subjects' cultural background, age, or socioeconomic status, information bias, measurement error, confounders, and further factors. Conclusions: Observational studies make an important contribution to medical knowledge. The main methodological problems can be avoided by careful study planning. An understanding of the potential pitfalls is important in order to critically assess relevant publications.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 668
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT METHODS CANC RE, DOI DOI 10.1097/00002030-199912240-00009
[2]   Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations -: I:: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group -: art. no. 38 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Henry, D ;
Hill, S ;
Liberati, A ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (1)
[3]  
Bonita R., 2007, BASIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, V2nd
[4]   Walking for prevention of cardiovascular disease in men and women: a systematic review of observational studies [J].
Boone-Heinonen, J. ;
Evenson, K. R. ;
Taber, D. R. ;
Gordon-Larsen, P. .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2009, 10 (02) :204-217
[5]   MISCLASSIFICATION BIAS ARISING FROM RANDOM ERROR IN EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR DUAL MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES [J].
BRENNER, H ;
BLETTNER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (06) :453-461
[6]   COMPARISON OF TREATMENT OF RENAL CALCULI BY OPEN SURGERY, PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
CHARIG, CR ;
WEBB, DR ;
PAYNE, SR ;
WICKHAM, JEA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 292 (6524) :879-882
[7]  
Crombie I., 2004, POCKET GUIDE CRITICA
[8]  
*DGEPI, LEITL GUT EP PRAX GE
[9]   Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors [J].
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Boreham, J ;
Sutherland, I .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7455) :1519-1528
[10]  
Greenhalgh T., 2003, READ PAPER