Self-deception as a mediator of cooperation and defection in varying social contexts described in the iterated prisoner's dilemma

被引:23
|
作者
Surbey, MK [1 ]
McNally, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Psychol, Sackville, NB E0A 3C0, Canada
关键词
self-deception; deception; cooperation; Prisoner's Dilemma;
D O I
10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00090-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Deception and self-deception mag be two related psychological capacities serving to enhance an individual's inclusive fitness. Self-deception has been defined as any psychological act in which one thought or belief is held at the expense of another. This study was designed to test the notion that we may deceive ourselves about our own intentions or the intentions of others in order to facilitate cooperation, if the cooperative behavior has the potential to improve fitness. We mag also deceive ourselves in situations where we may need to compete with others, if not competing might represent a loss of fitness. The Self-Deception Questionnaire was administered to 80 women and 70 men to determine their levels of self-deception. A series of vignettes, conforming to the Prisoner's Dilemma game format, were administered in questionnaire material to measure participant's predispositions to cooperate or defect in three different contexts (family, mating, and neutral). Men predicted they would be less cooperative than women over all conditions, and participants anticipated cooperating more with kin than with non-kin. Moreover, participants who were high self-deceivers chose more cooperative responses in both family and mating contexts than those with low self-deception scores. Finally, the three-way interaction among sex, context, and level of self-deception suggested that the role of self-deception in cooperation may vary according to the sex of the individual and the context. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 435
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of cooperation and defection on social decision making in depression: A study of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game
    Sorgi, Kristen M.
    van 't Wout, Mascha
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2016, 246 : 512 - 519
  • [2] A rationalization of cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma
    Spohn, W
    RATIONALITY, RULES, AND STRUCTURE, 2000, 28 : 67 - 84
  • [3] Evolving Cooperation for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Finocchiaro, Jessica
    Mathias, H. David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, : 199 - 200
  • [4] Clans and Cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Julstrom, Bryant A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION COMPANION (GECCO'12), 2012, : 1463 - 1464
  • [5] The emergence of cooperation in asynchronous iterated prisoner's dilemma
    Cornforth, David
    Newth, David
    SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4247 : 742 - 749
  • [6] Risk consideration and cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma
    Zeng, Weijun
    Li, Minqiang
    Chen, Fuzan
    Nan, Guofang
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 20 (02) : 567 - 587
  • [7] Risk consideration and cooperation in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma
    Weijun Zeng
    Minqiang Li
    Fuzan Chen
    Guofang Nan
    Soft Computing, 2016, 20 : 567 - 587
  • [8] Social Trends in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Finocchiaro, Jessica
    Mathias, H. David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCO'17 COMPANION), 2017, : 23 - 24
  • [9] Defection or Cooperation——Richard Power's Moral Insights in Prisoner's Dilemma
    梁渊
    宋祝
    陈益
    周永胜
    海外英语, 2021, (04) : 239 - 241
  • [10] Social Values and Cooperation. Results from an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Experiment
    Fleiss, Juergen
    Leopold-Wildburger, Ulrike
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2011, 2012, : 199 - 204