Reasons for Participation in Optional Pharmacokinetic Studies in Children With Cancer: A Children's Oncology Group Phase 1 Consortium Study

被引:12
作者
Berg, Stacey L. [1 ]
Winick, Naomi [2 ]
Ingle, Ashish Mark [3 ]
Adamson, Peter C. [4 ]
Blaney, Susan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Texas Childrens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Childrens Oncol Grp, Arcadia, CA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
cancer; children; ethics; pharmacokinetics; phase; 1; studies; I CLINICAL-TRIALS; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; INFORMED-CONSENT; DECISION-MAKING; ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS; ALTRUISTIC DISCOURSE; EXPECTATIONS; BIOPSIES; BENEFIT; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1002/pbc.22529
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies provide critical information about the disposition of anticancer drugs in children. In the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Phase 1 Consortium, pharmacokinetic studies are usually optional. We surveyed the attitudes towards PK studies among subjects in phase 1 trials at COG institutions. Methods. Subjects were eligible if they participated in a phase 1 anticancer drug study with optional PK studies within the 4 weeks, regardless of whether they agreed to participate in the PK studies. Staff provided demographics; subjects/parents completed a questionnaire. Results. Fifty eligible subjects enrolled. Thirty-six (72%) of the 50 eligible subjects consented to participate in PK studies; 14 (25%) declined. The most common reasons for participating were "the results might help researchers learn more about the drug" and "results from the pharmacokinetic studies might help other children." The most common reasons for not participating were "having the samples drawn would mean spending extra time in the hospital," and "my child might have needed a separate IV catheter in order to participate." Conclusions. The majority of subjects identified altruistic motives for participation in PK studies. Subjects who did not participate in PK studies identified extra time and need for an extra IV as important concerns. Simple interventions like sending staff to the subjects' home to draw PK samples or drawing samples from existing catheters could increase the number of subjects who are willing to participate in PK studies. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:119-122. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 122
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research [J].
Agrawal, Manish ;
Grady, Christine ;
Fairclough, Diane L. ;
Meropol, Neal J. ;
Maynard, Kim ;
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (27) :4479-4484
[2]   Impact and perceptions of mandatory tumor biopsies for correlative studies in clinical trials of novel anticancer agents [J].
Agulnik, Mark ;
Oza, Amit M. ;
Pond, Gregory R. ;
Siu, Lillian L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (30) :4801-4807
[3]   Tissue collection for correlative studies in childhood cancer clinical trials: Ethical considerations and special imperatives [J].
Anderson, BD ;
Adamson, PC ;
Weiner, SL ;
McCabe, MS ;
Smith, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (23) :4846-4850
[4]   THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION - INFORMED CONSENT IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 1982, 5 (3-4) :319-329
[5]   Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: A review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations [J].
Brown, Aaron P. ;
Wendler, David S. ;
Camphausen, Kevin A. ;
Miller, Franklin G. ;
Citrin, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (24) :3987-3994
[6]   Phase I participants' views of quality of life and trial participation burdens [J].
Cohen, Marlene Zichi ;
Slomka, Jacquelyn ;
Pentz, Rebecca D. ;
Flamm, Anne L. ;
Gold, David ;
Herbst, Roy S. ;
Abbruzzese, James L. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2007, 15 (07) :885-890
[7]   Altruistic motives reconsidered [J].
Ekamn Ladd, Rosalind ;
Forman, Edwin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (05) :55-56
[8]   Descriptions of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase 1 oncology trials [J].
Horng, S ;
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wilfond, B ;
Rackoff, J ;
Martz, K ;
Grady, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (26) :2134-2140
[9]  
Hutchison C, 1998, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), V7, P15, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1998.00062.x