River flow modelling: comparison of performance and evaluation of uncertainty using data-driven models and conceptual hydrological model

被引:36
作者
Zhang, Zhenghao [1 ]
Zhang, Qiang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [5 ,6 ]
Shi, Peijun [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Key Lab Environm Changes & Nat Hazards, Minist Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 10087, Peoples R China
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Wavelet decomposition; Artificial neural network; GR4J model; Bootstrap method; Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method; Uncertainty; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; CHANGING PROPERTIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GLUE METHOD; EAST RIVER; SHORT-TERM; STREAMFLOW; BASIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-018-1536-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological and statistical models are playing an increasing role in hydrological forecasting, particularly for river basins with data of different temporal scales. In this study, statistical models, e.g. artificial neural networks, adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, genetic programming, least squares support vector machine, multiple linear regression, were developed, based on parametric optimization methods such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), and data-preprocessing techniques such as wavelet decomposition (WD) for river flow modelling using daily streamflow data from four hydrological stations for a period of 1954-2009. These models were used for 1-, 3- and 5-day streamflow forecasting and the better model was used for uncertainty evaluation using bootstrap resampling method. Meanwhile, a simple conceptual hydrological model GR4J was used to evaluate parametric uncertainty based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Results indicated that: (1) GA and PSO did not help improve the forecast performance of the model. However, the hybrid model with WD significantly improved the forecast performance; (2) the hybrid model with WD as a data preprocessing procedure can clarify hydrological effects of water reservoirs and can capture peak high/ low flow changes; (3) Forecast accuracy of data-driven models is significantly influenced by the availability of streamflow data. More human interferences from the upper to the lower East River basin can help to introduce greater uncertainty in streamflow forecasts; (4) The structure of GR4J may introduce larger parametric uncertainty at the Longchuan station than at the Boluo station in the East river basin. This study provides a theoretical background for data-driven model-based streamflow forecasting and a comprehensive view about data and parametric uncertainty in data-scarce river basins.
引用
收藏
页码:2667 / 2682
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] River flow modelling: comparison of performance and evaluation of uncertainty using data-driven models and conceptual hydrological model
    Zhenghao Zhang
    Qiang Zhang
    Vijay P. Singh
    Peijun Shi
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2018, 32 : 2667 - 2682
  • [2] Comparison of data-driven modelling techniques for river flow forecasting
    Londhe, Shreenivas
    Charhate, Shrikant
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2010, 55 (07) : 1163 - 1174
  • [3] Impact Assessment of Rainfall-Runoff Simulations on the Flow Duration Curve of the Upper Indus River-A Comparison of Data-Driven and Hydrologic Models
    Rauf, Ateeq-ur
    Ghumman, Abdul Razzaq
    WATER, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [4] Assessment of uncertainty in river flow projections for the Mekong River using multiple GCMs and hydrological models
    Thompson, J. R.
    Green, A. J.
    Kingston, D. G.
    Gosling, S. N.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 486 : 1 - 30
  • [5] On Lack of Robustness in Hydrological Model Development Due to Absence of Guidelines for Selecting Calibration and Evaluation Data: Demonstration for Data-Driven Models
    Zheng, Feifei
    Maier, Holger R.
    Wu, Wenyan
    Dandy, Graeme C.
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    Zhang, Tuqiao
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (02) : 1013 - 1030
  • [6] Extent of detection of hidden relationships among different hydrological variables during floods using data-driven models
    Al Sawaf, Mohamad Basel
    Kawanisi, Kiyosi
    Jlilati, Mohamad Nazieh
    Xiao, Cong
    Bahreinimotlagh, Masoud
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (11)
  • [7] Hydrological modelling of karst catchment using lumped conceptual and data mining models
    Sezen, Cenk
    Bezak, Nejc
    Bai, Yun
    Sraj, Mojca
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 576 : 98 - 110
  • [8] Comparison of two data-driven approaches for daily river flow forecasting
    Fernando, Achela K.
    Shamseldin, Asaad Y.
    Abrahart, Robert J.
    19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 1077 - 1083
  • [9] Hydrological stream flow modelling for calibration and uncertainty analysis using SWAT model in the Xedone river basin, Lao PDR
    Vilaysane, Bounhieng
    Takara, Kaoru
    Luo, Pingping
    Akkharath, Inthavy
    Duan, Weili
    5TH SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR HUMAN SECURITY (SUSTAIN 2014), 2015, 28 : 380 - 390
  • [10] Ensemble and stochastic conceptual data-driven approaches for improving streamflow simulations: Exploring different hydrological and data-driven models and a diagnostic tool
    Hah, David
    Quilty, John M.
    Sikorska-Senoner, Anna E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 157