The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence

被引:166
作者
Lozano-Vivas, Ana [2 ]
Pasiouras, Fotios [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Crete, Dept Prod Engn & Management, Financial Engn Lab, Iraklion, Greece
[2] Univ Malaga, Dept Econ, E-29071 Malaga, Spain
[3] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Ctr Governance & Regulat, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Efficiency; Non-traditional activities; Off-balance sheet; Environmental variables; Regulatory conditions; PROFIT EFFICIENCY; COMMERCIAL-BANKS; COST; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; RISK; INEFFICIENCY; REGULATIONS; SUPERVISION; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relevance of non-traditional activities in the estimation of bank efficiency els using a sample of 752 publicly quoted commercial banks from 87 countries around the world, allowing comparison of the impact of such activities under different levels of economic development, geographical regions and other country characteristics. We estimate both cost and profit efficiency of banks using a traditional function that considers loans and other earnings assets as the only outputs, and two additional functions to account for non-traditional activities, one with off-balance sheet (OBS) items and the other with non-interest income as an additional output. Controlling for cross-country differences in regulatory and environmental conditions, we find that, on average, cost efficiency increases irrespective of whether we use OBS or non-interest income, although the results for profit efficiency are mixed. Our results also reveal that while the inclusion of non-traditional outputs does not alter the directional impact of environmental variables on bank inefficiency, regulations that restrict bank activities and enhance monitoring and supervision provisions improve both cost and profit efficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1436 / 1449
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The profit efficiency of small US commercial banks [J].
Akhigbe, A ;
McNulty, JE .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2003, 27 (02) :307-325
[2]   Frontier cost functions and bank efficiency [J].
Altunbas, Y ;
Chakravarty, SP .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 72 (02) :233-240
[3]   Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking [J].
Altunbas, Y ;
Liu, MH ;
Molyneux, P ;
Seth, R .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2000, 24 (10) :1605-1628
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 4646 WORLD BANK
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services
[6]  
Barth J.R., 2003, FINANCIAL MARKETS I, V12, P67, DOI DOI 10.1111/1468-0416.T01-2-00001
[7]  
Barth J.R., 2006, RETHINKING BANK REGU
[8]   Bank regulation and supervision: what works best? [J].
Barth, JR ;
Caprio, G ;
Levine, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2004, 13 (02) :205-248
[9]  
Barth JR, 2007, POLITICS FINANCIAL D
[10]  
Battese G. E., 1995, EMPIR ECON, V20, P325, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442