Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

被引:9
|
作者
He, Bingjie [1 ]
Chen, Weiye [1 ]
Liu, Lili [1 ]
Hou, Zheng [2 ]
Zhu, Haiyan [3 ]
Cheng, Haozhe [3 ]
Zhang, Yixi [3 ]
Zhan, Siyan [1 ]
Wang, Shengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Obster & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
cervical cancer; prediction model; predictors; risk of bias; statistical analysis; RISK; NOMOGRAM; CARCINOMA; TOOL; APPLICABILITY; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.654454
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This work aims to systematically identify, describe, and appraise all prognostic models for cervical cancer and provide a reference for clinical practice and future research. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases up to December 2020 and included studies developing, validating, or updating a prognostic model for cervical cancer. Two reviewers extracted information based on the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modeling Studies checklist and assessed the risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results: Fifty-six eligible articles were identified, describing the development of 77 prognostic models and 27 external validation efforts. The 77 prognostic models focused on three types of cervical cancer patients at different stages, i.e., patients with early-stage cervical cancer (n = 29; 38%), patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (n = 27; 35%), and all-stage cervical cancer patients (n = 21; 27%). Among the 77 models, the most frequently used predictors were lymph node status (n = 57; 74%), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (n = 42; 55%), histological types (n = 38; 49%), and tumor size (n = 37; 48%). The number of models that applied internal validation, presented a full equation, and assessed model calibration was 52 (68%), 16 (21%), and 45 (58%), respectively. Twenty-four models were externally validated, among which three were validated twice. None of the models were assessed with an overall low risk of bias. The Prediction Model of Failure in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer model was externally validated twice, with acceptable performance, and seemed to be the most reliable. Conclusions: Methodological details including internal validation, sample size, and handling of missing data need to be emphasized on, and external validation is needed to facilitate the application and generalization of models for cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognosis prediction models for post-stroke depression: a protocol for systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal
    Zhou, Lu
    Wang, Lei
    Liu, Gao
    Cai, EnLi
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [2] Risk prediction models for disability in older adults: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Zhou, Jinyan
    Xu, Yihong
    Yang, Dan
    Zhou, Qianya
    Ding, Shanni
    Pan, Hongying
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Qiu Lin
    Tong Yang
    Jin Yongmei
    Ye Mao Die
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [4] Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of the colonization or infection of multidrug-resistant organisms in adults: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
    Liu, Xu
    Liu, Xi
    Jin, Chenyue
    Luo, Yuting
    Yang, Lianping
    Ning, Xinjiao
    Zhuo, Chao
    Xiao, Fei
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2024, 30 (11) : 1364 - 1373
  • [5] Risk Prediction Models for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Hou, Yuqing
    Feng, Suwen
    Tong, Baoqin
    Lu, Shuping
    Wang, Hongyan
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, : 880 - 891
  • [6] Prediction models for postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and critical appraisal
    Cai, Shining
    Li, Jingjing
    Gao, Jian
    Pan, Wenyan
    Zhang, Yuxia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 136
  • [7] Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Havsed, Kristian
    Petersson, Gunnel Hansel
    Isberg, Per-Erik
    Pigg, Maria
    Svensater, Gunnel
    Foresight Res Consortium
    Rohlin, Madeleine
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [8] Prediction model for cognitive frailty in older adults: A systematic review and critical appraisal
    Huang, Jundan
    Zeng, Xianmei
    Hu, Mingyue
    Ning, Hongting
    Wu, Shuang
    Peng, Ruotong
    Feng, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 15
  • [9] Prediction models in first-episode psychosis: systematic review and critical appraisal
    Lee, Rebecca
    Leighton, Samuel P.
    Thomas, Lucretia
    Gkoutos, Georgios, V
    Wood, Stephen J.
    Fenton, Sarah-Jane H.
    Deligianni, Fani
    Cavanagh, Jonathan
    Mallikarjun, Pavan K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 220 (04) : 179 - 191
  • [10] Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Harrison, Hannah
    Thompson, Rachel E.
    Lin, Zhiyuan
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Stewart, Grant D.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (06): : 1380 - 1390