A comparison between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices

被引:2
|
作者
Dolocan, A
Dolocan, VO
Dolocan, V
机构
[1] CNRS, CRTBT, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Bucharest, Fac Phys, Bucharest, Romania
来源
MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B | 2004年 / 18卷 / 25期
关键词
two-dimensional lattice; two-dimensional space; black holes; threedimensional lattice;
D O I
10.1142/S0217984904007712
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
By using a new Hamiltonian of interaction we have calculated the interaction energy for two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices, We present also, approximate analytical formulae and the analytical formulae for the constant of the elastic force. The obtained results show that in the three-dimensional space, the two-dimensional lattice has the lattice constant and the cohesive energy which are smaller than that of the three-dimensional lattice. For appropriate values of the coupling constants, the two-dimensional lattice in a two-dimensional space has both the lattice constant and the cohesive energy, larger than that of the two-dimensional lattice in a three-dimensional space; this means that if there is a two-dimensional space in the Universe, this should be thinner than the three-dimensional space, while the interaction forces should be stronger. On the other hand, if the coupling constant in the two-dimensional lattice in the two-dimensional space is close to zero, the cohesive energy should be comparable with the cohesive energy from three-dimensional space but this two-dimensional space does not emit but absorbs radiation.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional sonography in evaluating fetal malformations
    Xu, HX
    Zhang, QP
    Lu, MD
    Xiao, XT
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2002, 30 (09) : 515 - 525
  • [22] A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of wear in a laboratory investigation
    Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Bartlett, David W.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (10) : E221 - E225
  • [23] Comparison of conventional two-dimensional and digital three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics
    Haude, Ana-Maria
    Lehmann, Thomas
    Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig
    Jacobs, Collin
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2025,
  • [24] Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional thermal models of the LENS® process
    Yin, H.
    Wang, L.
    Felicelli, S. D.
    JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (10):
  • [25] Abrupt Transition between Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Quantum Turbulence
    Muller, Nicolas P.
    Brachet, Marc-Etienne
    Alexakis, Alexandros
    Mininni, Pablo M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2020, 124 (13)
  • [26] Dissociation between two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography clinical implications
    Lindgren, F. Lyng
    Ringgren, K. Bundgaard
    Jacobsen, P. Ascanius
    Tayal, B.
    Kragholm, K. Hay
    Andersen, N. Holmark
    Zaremba, T.
    Biering-Sorensen, T.
    Mogelvang, R.
    Schnohr, P.
    Jensen, G. Boje
    Sogaard, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 92 - 92
  • [27] Three-dimensional surface and two-dimensional contour
    Nozawa, S
    PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 : 160 - 160
  • [28] Three-Dimensional Forces for Two-Dimensional Motion
    Verkhovsky, Alexander B.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 108 (04) : 781 - 782
  • [29] Three-dimensional solutions for two-dimensional problems
    Shen, A
    MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCER, 1997, 19 (03): : 44 - 47
  • [30] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional statistical mechanics of shear layers for flow between two parallel plates
    L. Shirkov
    V. Berdichevsky
    Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2013, 25 : 269 - 272