A comparison between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices

被引:2
|
作者
Dolocan, A
Dolocan, VO
Dolocan, V
机构
[1] CNRS, CRTBT, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Bucharest, Fac Phys, Bucharest, Romania
来源
MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B | 2004年 / 18卷 / 25期
关键词
two-dimensional lattice; two-dimensional space; black holes; threedimensional lattice;
D O I
10.1142/S0217984904007712
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
By using a new Hamiltonian of interaction we have calculated the interaction energy for two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices, We present also, approximate analytical formulae and the analytical formulae for the constant of the elastic force. The obtained results show that in the three-dimensional space, the two-dimensional lattice has the lattice constant and the cohesive energy which are smaller than that of the three-dimensional lattice. For appropriate values of the coupling constants, the two-dimensional lattice in a two-dimensional space has both the lattice constant and the cohesive energy, larger than that of the two-dimensional lattice in a three-dimensional space; this means that if there is a two-dimensional space in the Universe, this should be thinner than the three-dimensional space, while the interaction forces should be stronger. On the other hand, if the coupling constant in the two-dimensional lattice in the two-dimensional space is close to zero, the cohesive energy should be comparable with the cohesive energy from three-dimensional space but this two-dimensional space does not emit but absorbs radiation.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall
    Kaufmann, K.
    Gardner, A. D.
    Costes, M.
    NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 : 315 - 325
  • [2] A Comparison Between the Accuracy of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements
    Desai, Niranjan
    Poling, Joel
    Fischer, Gregor
    Georgakis, Christos
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, DIAGNOSTICS AND PROGNOSTICS OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2018, 1 (02):
  • [3] Field of View Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Endoscopy
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Tabor, Mark H.
    Youssef, A. Samy
    Lau, Tsz
    Carlson, Andrew P.
    van Loveren, Harry R.
    Agazzi, Siviero
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (02): : 387 - 390
  • [4] Spectroscopy of dipolar fermions in layered two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices
    Hazzard, Kaden R. A.
    Gorshkov, Alexey V.
    Rey, Ana Maria
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2011, 84 (03):
  • [5] A comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional grain boundary plane analysis
    Randle, V
    Davies, H
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2002, 90 (2-3) : 153 - 162
  • [6] Interleaving two-dimensional lattices to create three-dimensional photonic bandgap structures
    Reynolds, AL
    Arnold, JM
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-OPTOELECTRONICS, 1998, 145 (06): : 436 - 440
  • [7] Interleaving two-dimensional lattices to create three-dimensional photonic bandgap structures
    Optoelectronics Research Group, Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glascow G12 8LT, United Kingdom
    IEE Proc Optoelectron, 6 (436-440):
  • [8] A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion
    Gross, MM
    Trotman, CA
    Moffatt, KS
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1996, 66 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [9] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
    McDougall, EM
    Soble, JJ
    Wolf, JS
    Nakada, SY
    Elashry, OM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 371 - 374
  • [10] The comparison between the results of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional Models of Vehicle Bridge Interaction
    Kortis, Jan
    Daniel, Lubos
    XXIV R-S-P SEMINAR, THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (24RSP) (TFOCE 2015), 2015, 111 : 425 - 430