Time- and Frequency-Domain Characterization of Railgun Sliding Contact Noise

被引:12
|
作者
Engel, Thomas G. [1 ]
Rada, Nicholas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ctr Energy Convers & Electromech, Columbia, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Coilguns; electromagnetic launching; pulsed power systems; railgun; MUZZLE VOLTAGE;
D O I
10.1109/TPS.2017.2705172
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The noise in a railgun sliding contact is characterized in both the time and frequency domain in this investigation. Railgun operating parameters are typically 4 g projectiles traveling up to 100 m/s. The railgun is powered by a sequentially fired pulse forming network (PFN) consisting of eight electrolytic capacitor banks. Typical V-I characteristics of the PFN are approximately 20-kA peak current and 400-V peak voltage. The total pulsewidth is on the order of 6 ms. The noise is extracted from the muzzle voltage measurements using an improved method that can be applied to any electromagnetic launcher with a sliding contact. A variety of rail materials and rail coatings were investigated in regard to their effect on sliding contact noise. The noise is characterized in the time domain using statistical terms such as rms quantities. The Fourier transform is used to characterize the noise in the frequency domain. The results show that good and poor sliding contacts have particular average rms noise voltages and spectral signatures. The spectral signatures are used to quantitatively identify the point the difference between a good and a poor performing contact and to gain insight into the nature of the sliding contact's current conduction mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1326
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] JOINT TIME- AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN RESHAPING OF ROOM IMPULSE RESPONSES
    Jungmann, Jan Ole
    Mazur, Radoslaw
    Mertins, Alfred
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2015, : 733 - 737
  • [32] Multiscale Time- and Frequency-domain Likelihood Analysis with Photon Weights
    Kerr, M.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 885 (01):
  • [33] Critical comparison between time- and frequency-domain relaxation functions
    Snyder, CR
    Mopsik, FI
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 60 (02): : 984 - 990
  • [34] LFT uncertain model validation with time- and frequency-domain measurements
    Xu, DM
    Ren, Z
    Gu, GX
    Chen, J
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1999, 44 (07) : 1435 - 1441
  • [35] Time- and frequency-domain analysis of fluorescence lifetime for temperature sensors
    Fernicola, VC
    Rosso, L
    2000 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS DIGEST, 2000, : 587 - 588
  • [36] Time- and frequency-domain responses of the brain to standard experimental paradigms
    Karakas, S
    Erzengin, ÖU
    Çakmak, ED
    2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Vols 1 and 2, Symposium Record, 2003, : 840 - 843
  • [37] Comparison between time- and frequency-domain high-frequency device characterizations
    Bieler, Mark
    Arz, Uwe
    2016 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2016), 2016,
  • [38] Time- vs. frequency-domain femtosecond surface sum frequency generation
    Roke, S
    Kleyn, AW
    Bonn, M
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2003, 370 (1-2) : 227 - 232
  • [39] TIME- VERSUS FREQUENCY-DOMAIN INVERSE ELASTIC SCATTERING: THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    Liu, X.
    Song, J.
    Pourahmadian, F.
    Haddar, H.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 83 (03) : 1296 - 1314
  • [40] Combination of time- and frequency-domain methods for the analysis of open resonators with gratings
    Sirenko, YK
    Velychko, LG
    ICECOM 2003, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 415 - 418