Hybrid physics-based and data-driven models for smart manufacturing: Modelling, simulation, and explainability

被引:114
作者
Wang, Jinjiang [1 ]
Li, Yilin [1 ]
Gao, Robert X. [2 ]
Zhang, Fengli [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Safety & Ocean Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Smart manufacturing; Hybrid physics-based and data-driven; Data-driven models; Physical knowledge; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; TIME STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE; MACHINE; METHODOLOGY; REDUCTION; PARADIGM; BEARING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
To overcome the limitations associated with purely physics-based and data-driven modeling methods, hybrid, physics-based data-driven models have been developed, with improved model transparency, interpretability, and analytic capabilities at reduced computational cost. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of hybrid physicsbased data-driven models towards realizing a higher degree of autonomous and error-free operation in smart manufacturing. Recognizing the complementary strengths of pure physics-based and data-driven models, hybrid physics-based data-driven models are categorized as consisting of three types: (1) physics-informed machine learning, (2) machine learning-assisted simulation, and (3) explainable artificial intelligence. The principles and characteristics of these three types of hybrid physics-based data-driven models are summarized to address three aspects of smart manufacturing: product design, operation and maintenance, and intelligent decision making. Finally, the prospective directions and challenges of hybrid physics-based data-driven models are discussed from the perspective of data, scientific insights, interpretability of hyperparameters, and trading off between accuracy and explainability.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 391
页数:11
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Alonso J. J, 2013, 51 AIAA AEROSPACE S, DOI [10.2514/6.2013-259, DOI 10.2514/6.2013-259]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, VISUALIZING HIGHER L
[3]   Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning for Geneticists [J].
Azodi, Christina B. ;
Tang, Jiliang ;
Shiu, Shin-Han .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2020, 36 (06) :442-455
[4]   Accelerating geostatistical modeling using geostatistics-informed machine Learning [J].
Bai, Tao ;
Tahmasebi, Pejman .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 146
[5]   IRoSim: Industrial Robotics Simulation Design Planning and Optimization platform based on CAD and knowledgeware technologies [J].
Baizid, Khelifa ;
Cukovic, Sasa ;
Iqbal, Jamshed ;
Yousnadj, Ali ;
Chellali, Ryad ;
Meddahi, Amal ;
Devedzic, Goran ;
Ghionea, Ionut .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2016, 42 :121-134
[6]   Operator inference for non-intrusive model reduction of systems with non-polynomial nonlinear terms [J].
Benner, Peter ;
Goyal, Pawan ;
Kramer, Boris ;
Peherstorfer, Benjamin ;
Willcox, Karen .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 372
[7]   Prestack and poststack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network [J].
Biswas, Reetam ;
Sen, Mrinal K. ;
Das, Vishal ;
Mukerji, Tapan .
INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2019, 7 (03) :SE161-SE174
[8]   Sensor data and information fusion to construct digital-twins virtual machine tools for cyber-physical manufacturing [J].
Cai, Yi ;
Starly, Binil ;
Cohen, Paul ;
Lee, Yuan-Shin .
45TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 45), 2017, 10 :1031-1042
[9]  
Chang C, 2016, American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, V115, P1785
[10]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)