Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer

被引:15
作者
Leeman, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Chen, Ming-Hui [2 ]
Huland, Hartwig [3 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
D'Amico, Anthony, V [1 ]
Tilki, Derya [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Eppendorf, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Eppendorf, Germany
关键词
Active surveillance; mpMRI; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; LOW-RISK; BIOPSY; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; CORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to identify a subset of men with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer who should be recommended for staging by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). In a cohort of 3571 men, older age was associated with upgrading/upstaging at radical prostatectomy among men with a percentage of positive biopsy cores >= 33%. Obtaining a mpMRI in healthy older men with GS6 prostate cancer and >= 33% positive biopsy cores should be considered. Purpose: To identify a subset of men with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer who are at high risk for upgrading/upstaging who should be recommended for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Patients and Methods: Between 1992 and 2017, a total of 3571 men with GS6 prostate cancer were consecutively treated at a single institution with radical prostatectomy. Logistic regression multivariable analyses to determine the odds of upgrading and upstaging were performed, adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, clinical T category, prostate-specific antigen level, number of biopsy cores, and percentage of positive biopsy cores. Results: Of 3571 men, the disease of 115 (3.22%), 245 (6.86%), and 254 (7.11%) was upgraded, was upstaged, or had positive surgical margins (R1), respectively. Older age at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of upgrading disease to GS7 or higher, prostatectomy T3/T4, and R1 with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.05 (1.01-1.08; P = .005), 1.02 (1.00-1.05; P = .048), and 1.02 (1.002-1.05; P = .03), respectively. Older age was associated with an increasing proportion of men with disease upgraded to GS7 or higher (T1c: P = .002; T2 or higher: P = .04) or upstaged to pT3/4 or pT2R1 (T1c: P = .02; T2 or higher: P = .02) among men with >= 33% but not < 33% positive biopsy cores. Conclusion: Before initiating active surveillance, performing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in otherwise healthy older men with GS6 prostate cancer and >= 33% positive biopsy cores should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:E1116 / E1121
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 2012, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, P163
  • [2] Agresti A., 2012, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, P69
  • [3] Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance
    Busch, Jonas
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Leva, Natalia
    Ferrari, Michelle
    Kramer, Juergen
    Klopf, Christian
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    Miller, Kurt
    Brooks, James D.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (04) : 517 - 521
  • [4] NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection
    Carroll, Peter H.
    Mohler, James L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (05): : 620 - 623
  • [5] Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    Hong, Matthew K. H.
    Casey, Rowan G.
    Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
    Peters, Justin
    Harewood, Laurence
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Hovens, Chris M.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) : E202 - E210
  • [6] Clinical predictors of upgrading to gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: Potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy
    D'Amico, AV
    Renshaw, AA
    Arsenault, L
    Schultz, D
    Richie, JP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04): : 841 - 846
  • [7] The clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome following external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Schultz, D
    Silver, B
    Henry, L
    Hurwitz, M
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Renshaw, AA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03): : 679 - 684
  • [8] Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Dinh, Kathryn T.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Ziehr, David R.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Viswanathan, Vidya B.
    Nezolosky, Michelle D.
    Beard, Clair J.
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Martin, Neil E.
    Orio, Peter F.
    Sweeney, Christopher J.
    Trinh, Quoc D.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (02) : 343 - 349
  • [9] Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Fukagai, T
    Namiki, T
    Namiki, H
    Carlile, RG
    Shimada, M
    Yoshida, H
    [J]. PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 51 (05) : 364 - 370
  • [10] 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hamdy, F. C.
    Donovan, J. L.
    Lane, J. A.
    Mason, M.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Holding, P.
    Davis, M.
    Peters, T. J.
    Turner, E. L.
    Martin, R. M.
    Oxley, J.
    Robinson, M.
    Staffurth, J.
    Walsh, E.
    Bollina, P.
    Catto, J.
    Doble, A.
    Doherty, A.
    Gillatt, D.
    Kockelbergh, R.
    Kynaston, H.
    Paul, A.
    Powell, P.
    Prescott, S.
    Rosario, D. J.
    Rowe, E.
    Neal, D. E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) : 1415 - 1424