Analyzing the effects of inhomogeneity on the permeability of porous media containing methane hydrates through pore network models combined with CT observation

被引:127
作者
Yang, Lei [1 ]
Ai, Li [1 ]
Xue, Kaihua [2 ]
Ling, Zheng [1 ]
Li, Yanghui [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Ocean Energy Utilizat & Energy Conservat, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Inhomogeneous porous media; Permeability; Pore network model; Gas hydrate; X-ray CT; GAS HYDRATE; RELATIVE PERMEABILITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CAPILLARY-PRESSURE; BEARING SEDIMENTS; DEPRESSURIZATION; DISSOCIATION; WATER; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.100
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The permeability of porous media containing gas hydrates is of crucial importance in predicting the fluid flow behavior and gas production capacity during the exploitation of gas hydrate resource. Gas hydrates are generally unevenly distributed in the natural samples, the inhomogeneity of which could have significant impacts on the permeability properties. So here we extend our study on the permeability of heterogeneous hydrate-bearing porous media using pore network models combined with X-ray computed tomography (CT). The effects of varying pore/throat radii, non-even distribution of hydrates and fluid flow directions on the absolute and relative permeability are discussed. It is indicated that the rather high water saturation would significantly impact the gas permeation, which is not favorable for gas production. The microstructures of pores and throats would likely differ even under similar porosities; some pores may not have sufficient throats connected to them, limiting the fluid flow. The absolute permeability could also significantly vary with flow directions; the direction favorable for gas flow may not be true for water flow. This finding can be of help in case a preferential gas production is more required rather than water in the field test. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Influence of pore structure parameters on flow characteristics based on a digital rock and the pore network model
    An, Senyou
    Yao, Jun
    Yang, Yongfei
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhao, Jianlin
    Gao, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 31 : 156 - 163
  • [2] Formation pressure testing at the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Operational summary, history matching, and interpretations
    Anderson, Brian
    Hancock, Steve
    Wilson, Scott
    Enger, Christopher
    Collett, Timothy
    Boswell, Ray
    Hunter, Robert
    [J]. MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) : 478 - 492
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, POROUS MEDIA FLUID T
  • [4] [Anonymous], CLATHRATE HYDRATES N
  • [5] Detailed physics, predictive capabilities and macroscopic consequences for pore-network models of multiphase flow
    Blunt, MJ
    Jackson, MD
    Piri, M
    Valvatne, PH
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2002, 25 (8-12) : 1069 - 1089
  • [6] Flow in porous media - pore-network models and multiphase flow
    Blunt, MJ
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2001, 6 (03) : 197 - 207
  • [7] Current perspectives on gas hydrate resources
    Boswell, Ray
    Collett, Timothy S.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (04) : 1206 - 1215
  • [8] Is Gas Hydrate Energy Within Reach?
    Boswell, Ray
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5943) : 957 - 958
  • [9] Multi-scale, micro-computed tomography-based pore network models to simulate drainage in heterogeneous rocks
    Bultreys, Tom
    Van Hoorebeke, Luc
    Cnudde, Veerle
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 78 : 36 - 49
  • [10] Microstructural evolution of gas hydrates in sedimentary matrices observed with synchrotron X-ray computed tomographic microscopy
    Chaouachi, Marwen
    Falenty, Andrzej
    Sell, Kathleen
    Enzmann, Frieder
    Kersten, Michael
    Haberthuer, David
    Kuhs, Werner F.
    [J]. GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2015, 16 (06) : 1711 - 1722