Coping with Group Behaviors in Uncertain Quality Function Deployment

被引:14
|
作者
Yan, Hong-Bin [1 ]
Ma, Tieju [1 ]
Van-Nam Huynh [2 ]
机构
[1] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Japan Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Knowledge Sci, Nomi City, Ishikawa 9231292, Japan
关键词
Group Behaviors; Order-based Semantics; Subjective Perception; Uncertain QFD; User Variability; DECISION-MAKING APPROACH; PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; FUZZY WEIGHTED AVERAGE; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; EXPECTED VALUE; QFD; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12104
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a planning and problem-solving tool gaining wide acceptance for translating customer needs (CNs) into technical attributes (TAs) of a product. It is a crucial step to derive the prioritization of TAs from CNs in QFD. However, it is not so straightforward to prioritize TAs due to two types of uncertainties: human subjective perception and user variability. The main focus of this article is to propose a group decision-making approach to uncertain QFD with an application to a flexible manufacturing system design. The proposed approach performs computations solely based on the order-based semantics of linguistic labels to eliminate the burden of quantifying qualitative concepts in QFD. Moreover, it incorporates the importance weights of users and the concept of fuzzy majority into aggregations of individual fuzzy preference relations of different TAs in order to model the group behaviors in QFD. Finally, based on a quantifier-guided net flow score procedure, the proposed approach derives a priority ranking with a classification of TAs into important and unimportant ones so as to provide a better decision-support to the decision-maker. Due to the easiness in articulating preferential information, our approach can reduce the cognitive burden of QFD planning team and give a practical convenience in the process of QFD planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1052
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] On quantitative of Quality Function Deployment
    Li, JH
    Liu, CS
    Cui, HJ
    '99 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 805 - 808
  • [12] An advanced quality function deployment model using fuzzy analytic network process
    Liu, Hao-Tien
    Wang, Chih-Hong
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2010, 34 (11) : 3333 - 3351
  • [13] Fuzzy Group Decision-Making for Service Innovations in Quality Function Deployment
    Lin, Ling-Zhong
    Huang, Liang-Chih
    Yeh, Huery-Ren
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2012, 21 (04) : 495 - 517
  • [14] A quality function deployment framework for service strategy planning
    Kamvysi, Konstantina
    Andronikidis, Andreas
    Georgiou, Andreas C.
    Gotzamani, Katerina
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2023, 73
  • [15] Systematical decision-making approach for quality function deployment based on uncertain linguistic term sets
    Peng, Jian-Gang
    Xia, Guang
    Sun, Bao-Qun
    Wang, Shao-Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (18) : 6183 - 6200
  • [16] Group Decision-Making and a Design Communication Model Using Quality Function Deployment
    Chun, Jaeyoul
    Cho, Jaeho
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 17 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [17] INTEGRATION OF TRIZ INTO QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
    Tursch, Philipp
    Goldmann, Christine
    Woll, Ralf
    MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2015, 6 (02) : 56 - 62
  • [18] Cost engineering with quality function deployment
    Bode, J
    Fung, RYK
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 35 (3-4) : 587 - 590
  • [19] A new approach for prioritising engineering characteristics in quality function deployment
    Iranmanesh, Seyed Hossein
    Mokhtarani, Mohammad Hossein
    Rastegar, Hamid
    International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2015, 19 (04) : 547 - 565