Late cardiotoxicity after bolus versus infusion anthracycline therapy for childhood cancers

被引:21
作者
Gupta, M [1 ]
Steinherz, PG [1 ]
Cheung, NK [1 ]
Steinherz, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY | 2003年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词
cardiotoxicity; shortening fraction; anthracyclines;
D O I
10.1002/mpo.10298
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the long-term myocardial function of patients who had been treated with infusion anthracycline therapy (administered continuously over >24 hr, IG) versus bolus therapy (administered over <30 min, BG). Methods. We selected 25 patients (BG) and 19 patients (IG) who had three or more years of disease free survival. We evaluated the echocardiograms for left ventricular shortening fraction (SF) obtained at baseline, within one year after the end of therapy (early follow-up), and on long-term follow-up. Results. The mean anthracycline dose in the BG was 385 mg/m(2) and in the IG was 345 mg/m(2) (P=0.07). During therapy, one patient in BG and none in IG developed diminished SF. During early follow-up, five of the 22 patients in BG and one of the 17 patients in IG developed diminished SF (P=0.2). Of these five patients with diminished SF, three patients in BG and none in IG continued to have abnormally low SF long-term. At mean of 7 years, five of the 25 patients in BG and two of the 19 in IG had diminished SF on (P=0.7). Late left ventricular dilatation was seen in 8% in BG and 5% in IG (P=1.0). Conclusions. At mean of 7 years after end of therapy, diminished cardiac function was seen in 20% of the patient who had received bolus anthracycline compared to 11% of patients who had received it via infusion. This difference did not prove to be statistically significant. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003;40:343-347. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 347
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   DOXORUBICIN - EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SCHEDULES ON TOXICITY AND ANTI-TUMOR EFFICACY [J].
BIELACK, SS ;
ERTTMANN, R ;
WINKLER, K ;
LANDBECK, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 25 (05) :873-882
[2]  
CASPER ES, 1991, CANCER, V68, P1221, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910915)68:6<1221::AID-CNCR2820680607>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-R
[4]  
Ewer MS, 1998, MED PEDIATR ONCOL, V31, P512, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199812)31:6<512::AID-MPO8>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-4
[6]  
GREENE RF, 1983, CANCER RES, V43, P3417
[7]  
Grenier MA, 1998, SEMIN ONCOL, V25, P72
[8]  
HORTOBAGYI GN, 1989, CANCER, V63, P37, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<37::AID-CNCR2820630106>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-Z
[10]  
Kakadekar AP, 1997, MED PEDIATR ONCOL, V28, P22, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199701)28:1<22::AID-MPO5>3.0.CO