Environmental drivers for riparian restoration success and ecosystem services supply in Mediterranean agricultural landscapes

被引:12
|
作者
Castellano, Clara [1 ,2 ]
Bruno, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Comin, Francisco A. [1 ,2 ]
Masip, Adria [5 ]
Benayas, Jose M. Rey [3 ,4 ]
Jimenez, Juan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, IPE, Avda Montanana 1005, Zaragoza 50059, Spain
[2] Avda Ntra Sra Victoria 16, Jaca 22700, Spain
[3] Alcala Univ, Life Sci Dept, E-28805 Alcala De Henares, Spain
[4] Fdn Int Restaurac Ecosistemas, Princesa 3 dpdo, Apto 703, E-28008 Madrid, Spain
[5] Burgeon Environm Solut, C Major 30, El Vilosell 25457, Spain
关键词
Carbon storage; Habitat provision; Revegetation; Riparian forest; Microclimate regulation; Water purification; CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY; WATER REPELLENCY; SOIL PROPERTIES; SALT TOLERANCE; VEGETATION; RIVER; GROWTH; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108048
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Riparian forests nestled in agricultural landscapes represent a small proportion in crop-intensive areas, while contributing remarkably to their biodiversity. This biodiversity supports several ecological processes crucially involved in the supply of ecosystem services (ES) complementary to that provided by agricultural lands and also relevant for designing biodiverse and multifunctional landscapes. Riparian forest is one of the most threatened ecosystems due to land-use intensification and associated water extraction, especially in Mediterranean semi-arid areas, and proper evaluation of the success of riparian restoration projects is usually lacking. Furthermore, there is little empirical evidence of the effects of riparian restoration on ES supply. In this study, we first investigated the effect of hydrological and soil features on survival and growth of saplings planted in degraded riparian areas in two Mediterranean watersheds. Then, we evaluated how riparian restoration affected the supply of ES, comparing nine regulating and supporting ES on these restored areas with other riparian areas spanning a gradient of conservation status, and with other natural and agricultural land-uses in the same watershed. We found that restoration success mainly depended on water table depth, soil salinity and soil nutrients (namely Mg+2 and Olsen P). Moreover, we detected an antagonistic interaction between the latter two, and a synergetic interaction between water table depth and soil salinity. Forest patches provided meaningful regulating and supporting ES in agricultural landscapes. In particular, riparian restoration zones increased the supply of regulating and supporting ES (water purification, habitat provision, microclimate regulation and soil C storage) in comparison with degraded natural land-uses and crops. Nevertheless, they were still far from the magnitude and range of ES provided by mature riparian forests. These results highlight the importance of focusing management practices on conserving riparian forest patches and restoring the degraded ones to reconcile agricultural production with the maintenance or enhancement of ES in agricultural Mediterranean landscapes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of massive development projects on ecosystem services in Mediterranean rural landscapes
    Salhi, Adil
    Benabdelouahab, Sara
    Mettouchi, Mehdi
    Vila Subiros, Josep
    Bouchlouch, Zakaria
    Benabdelouahab, Tarik
    Himi, Mahjoub
    Casas Ponsati, Albert
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 29
  • [42] Farmers' Value Assessment of Sociocultural and Ecological Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes
    Temesgen, Habtamu
    Wu, Wei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
  • [43] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes - are we asking the right questions?
    Swift, MJ
    Izac, AMN
    van Noordwijk, M
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 104 (01) : 113 - 134
  • [44] A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Yang, Wanhong
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Ward, John R.
    Wells, Geoff
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Connor, Jeffrey D.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) : 680 - 689
  • [45] Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
    Assandri, Giacomo
    Bogliani, Giuseppe
    Pedrini, Paolo
    Brambilla, Mattia
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 256 : 200 - 210
  • [46] Managing ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: are the solutions the same?
    Macfadyen, Sarina
    Cunningham, Saul A.
    Costamagna, Alejandro C.
    Schellhorn, Nancy A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 49 (03) : 690 - 694
  • [47] A decision-making framework for evaluating environmental tradeoffs in enhancing ecosystem services across complex agricultural landscapes
    Triana, Juan S. Acero
    Chu, Maria L.
    Shipley, Nathan J.
    van Riper, Carena J.
    Stewart, William P.
    Suski, Cory D.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 314
  • [48] Native bee Pollination Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Wetlands and Riparian Protected Lands
    Hinson, Audra L.
    Mccarty, Greg
    Du, Ling
    Sichko, Christopher
    Maguire, Karen
    WETLANDS, 2024, 44 (08)
  • [49] Threshold Effects between Ecosystem Services and Natural and Social Drivers in Karst Landscapes
    Zhao, Mantong
    Zhou, Qiuwen
    Luo, Yingzhong
    Li, Yuan
    Wang, Yalin
    Yuan, Ershuang
    LAND, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [50] Biocultural restoration improves delivery of ecosystem services in social-ecological landscapes
    Sena, Pedro H. A.
    Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
    Goncalves, Paulo H. S.
    Ferreira, Paulo S. M.
    Gusmao, Reginaldo A. F.
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)