Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial

被引:18
作者
Wilson, Sylvia H. [1 ]
Wolf, Bethany J. [2 ]
Robinson, Stefanie M. [1 ,4 ]
Nelson, Cecil [3 ,5 ]
Hebbar, Latha [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, 167 Ashley Ave,Suite 301,MSC 912, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] East Carolina Anesthesia Associates, Greenville, NC USA
[5] Reg Obstetr Consultants, Chattanooga, TN USA
关键词
Acetaminophen; Analgesia; Obstetrical; Analgesics; Non-narcotic; Cesarean Section; Pain; Postoperative; INTRATHECAL MORPHINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PAIN; PARACETAMOL; EFFICACY; OPIOIDS; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pny253
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Design. Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting. A single academic medical center. Subjects. Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Methods. This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Results. Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Conclusions. Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1591
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Randomized controlled trial of intravenous acetaminophen for postcesarean delivery pain control [J].
Altenau, Brie ;
Crisp, Catrina C. ;
Devaiah, C. Ganga ;
Lambers, Donna S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (03) :362.e1-362.e6
[2]   Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: patterns and predictors among opioid-naive women [J].
Bateman, Brian T. ;
Franklin, Jessica M. ;
Bykov, Katsiaryna ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Shrank, William H. ;
Brennan, Troyen A. ;
Landon, Joan E. ;
Rathmell, James P. ;
Huybrechts, Krista F. ;
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Choudhry, Niteesh K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (03) :353.e1-353.e18
[3]  
COHEN SE, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V16, P141
[4]   Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia - A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Dahl, JB ;
Jeppesen, IS ;
Jorgensen, H ;
Wetterslev, J ;
Moiniche, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) :1919-1927
[5]   Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section [J].
Dualé, C ;
Frey, C ;
Bolandard, F ;
Barrière, A ;
Schoeffler, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (05) :690-694
[6]  
Elia N, 2005, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V103, P1296, DOI 10.1097/00000542-200512010-00025
[7]   Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2010-2011 [J].
Hamilton, Brady E. ;
Hoyert, Donna L. ;
Martin, Joyce A. ;
Strobino, Donna M. ;
Guyer, Bernard .
PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (03) :548-558
[8]   Comparison of analgaesia with lumbar epidurals and lumbar plexus nerve blocks in patients receiving multimodal analgaesics following primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis [J].
Harvey, N. Robert ;
Wolf, Bethany J. ;
Bolin, Eric D. ;
Wilson, Sylvia H. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (11) :2229-2235
[9]   Comparative Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Paracetamol After Intravenous and Oral Administration [J].
Langford, Roger A. ;
Hogg, Malcolm ;
Bjorksten, Andrew R. ;
Williams, Daryl L. ;
Leslie, Kate ;
Jamsen, Kris ;
Kirkpatrick, Carl .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 (03) :610-615
[10]   Postcesarean analgesia: effective strategies and association with chronic pain [J].
Lavand'homme, Patricia .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (03) :244-248