Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Selection of the Optimal Mining Design Solution-A Case Study on Quarry "Tambura"

被引:8
作者
Farkas, Branimir [1 ]
Hrastov, Ana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Min Geol & Petr Engn, Pierottijeva 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Nikole Tesle 21, Ozalj 47280, Croatia
关键词
multiple-criteria decision-making methods; MCDM; PROMETHEE II; AHP; quarry; Tambura; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPEN-PIT MINE; DECISION-MAKING; COAL-MINE; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.3390/en14113200
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Mining design is usually evaluated with different multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods when it comes to large open pit or underground ore mines, but it is not used on quarry sites. Since Croatia is mostly mining stone, the implementation of such methods in decision making of the quarry mine design is imperative but left out. In this paper, the PROMETHEE II and AHP decision-making methods are implemented on the quarry site to find out the best final quarry design contour. By implementing the MCDM methods, the best quarry model was chosen based on 22 different criteria parameters out of three final quarry designs. The chosen model is not only financially sound but also has the least environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE
    Albadvi, Amir
    Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal
    Esfahanipour, Akbar
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 177 (02) : 673 - 683
  • [2] Alpay S, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4570, P334
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D
  • [4] Appianing E.J. A., 2015, GHANA MINING J, V15, P27
  • [5] Selection of the most proper drilling and blasting pattern by using MADM methods (A case study: Saugan iron Ore Mine, Iran)
    Aryafar, Ahmad
    Rahimdel, Mohammad Javad
    Tavakkoli, Ehsan
    [J]. RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2020, 35 (03): : 97 - 108
  • [6] Suitable mining method for Golbini No. 8 deposit in Jajarm (Iran) using TOPSIS method
    Ataei, M.
    Sereshki, F.
    Jamshidi, M.
    Jalali, S. M. E.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION A-MINING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 117 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [7] Uncertainty Representation Method for Open Pit Optimization Results Due to Variation in Mineral Prices
    Baek, Jieun
    Choi, Yosoon
    Park, Han-su
    [J]. MINERALS, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [8] Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Underground Mining Method Selection
    Bajic, Sanja
    Bajic, Dragoljub
    Gluscevic, Branko
    Vakanjac, Vesna
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (02):
  • [9] A Comparative Study of Various Multi-criteria Decision-Making Models in Underground Mining Method Selection
    Balusa B.C.
    Gorai A.K.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 2019, 100 (01) : 105 - 121
  • [10] Balusa Bhanu Chander, 2019, Journal of Sustainable Mining, V18, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jsm.2018.10.003