Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community

被引:84
作者
Ciani, Keith D. [1 ]
Middleton, Michael J. [2 ]
Summers, Jessica J. [3 ]
Sheldon, Kennon M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Educ, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Educ Psychol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Goal structures; Achievement goals; Classroom community; Autonomy support; Motivation; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; STUDENT MOTIVATION; SELF-DETERMINATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PROBING INTERACTIONS; MEDIATING ROLE; SCHOOL; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.001
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The culture of schooling in the United States has become increasingly focused on outwardly proving student competence. Some achievement goal theorists suggest that a major casualty of performance-oriented classroom environments may be student motivation for developing and improving competence. The present study extends across theoretical frameworks of motivation to highlight student perceptions of contextual variables that may mitigate or "buffer" the negative relationship between a perceived performance-oriented classroom goal structure and mastery goals. Survey data were collected from 178 high school students in 15 mathematics classes. Multilevel modeling was used to test student perceptions of three contextual buffers: classroom community, teacher's autonomy support, and a mastery classroom goal structure. Two significant interactions revealed that classroom community and autonomy support erased the negative effect of a perceived performance classroom goal structure. Results provide practitioners with tools for counteracting potential negative implications of emphasizing performance in the classroom, (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]  
Alexander P.A., 2005, The No Child Left Behind legislation: Educational research and federal funding, P27
[3]   ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CLASSROOM - STUDENTS LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATION PROCESSES [J].
AMES, C ;
ARCHER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 80 (03) :260-267
[4]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[5]  
Ames C., 1992, STUDENT PERCEPTIONS, P327, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203052532
[6]   MOTIVATION AND STRATEGY USE IN SCIENCE - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND CLASSROOM EFFECTS [J].
ANDERMAN, EM ;
YOUNG, AJ .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1994, 31 (08) :811-831
[7]   Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school [J].
Anderman, EM ;
Midgley, C .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (04) :499-517
[8]   MOTIVATION AND SCHOOLING IN THE MIDDLE GRADES [J].
ANDERMAN, EM ;
MAEHR, ML .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 64 (02) :287-309
[9]  
Anderman L.H., 1999, Journal of Research and Development in Education, V32, P89, DOI DOI 10.1006/CEPS.1998.0978
[10]  
Anderman LH, 2002, GOALS, GOAL STRUCTURES, AND PATTERNS OF ADAPTIVE LEARNING, P243