The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials

被引:499
作者
Dennis, M
Godley, SH
Diamond, G
Tims, FM
Babor, T
Donaldson, J
Liddle, H
Titus, JC
Kaminer, Y
Webb, C
Hamilton, N
Funk, R
机构
[1] Chestnut Hlth Syst, Bloomington, IL 61701 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Family Intervent Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Ctr Subst Abuse Treatment Subst Abuse & Mental Hl, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Operat PAR Inc, St Petersburg, FL USA
[6] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[7] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT USA
[8] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Ctr Treatment Res Adolescent Drug Abuse, Miami, FL USA
关键词
Marijuana; manual-guided therapy; adolescents; treatment effectiveness; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2003.09.005
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article presents the main outcome findings from two inter-related randomized trials conducted at four sites to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of five short-term outpatient interventions for adolescents with cannabis use disorders. Trial I compared five sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) with a 12-session regimen of MET and CBT (MET/CBT 12) and another that included family education and therapy components (Family Support Network [FSN]). Trial II compared the five-session MET/CBT with the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (ACRA) and Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT). The 600 cannabis users were predominately white males, aged 15-16. All five CYT interventions demonstrated significant pre-post treatment improvements during the 12 months after random assignment to a treatment intervention in the two main outcomes: days of abstinence and the percent of adolescents in recovery (no use or abuse/dependence problems and living in the community). Overall, the clinical outcomes were very similar across sites and conditions; however, after controlling for initial severity, the most cost-effective interventions were MET/CBT5 and MET/CBT12 in Trial 1 and ACRA and MET/CBT5 in Trial 2. It is possible that the similar results occurred because outcomes were driven more by general factors beyond the treatment approaches tested in this study; or because of shared, general helping factors across therapies that helped these teens attend to and decrease their connection to cannabis and alcohol. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 213
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Achenbach T. M., 1991, Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and the TRF profiles
  • [2] *AM SOC ADD MED, 1996, PAT PLAC CRIT TREATM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, MOTIVATIONAL ENHANCE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Treatment matching in alcoholism
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, BRIDG GAP PRACT RES
  • [6] Adolescent problem behavior: the influence of parents and peers
    Ary, DV
    Duncan, TE
    Duncan, SC
    Hops, H
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 (03) : 217 - 230
  • [7] BEHAVIOR-THERAPY FOR DRUG-ABUSE - A CONTROLLED TREATMENT OUTCOME STUDY
    AZRIN, NH
    MCMAHON, PT
    DONOHUE, B
    BESALEL, VA
    LAPINSKI, KJ
    KOGAN, ES
    ACIERNO, RE
    GALLOWAY, E
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1994, 32 (08) : 857 - 866
  • [8] A controlled evaluation and description of individual-cognitive problem solving and family-behavior therapies in dually-diagnosed conduct-disordered and substance-dependent youth
    Azrin, NH
    Donohue, B
    Teichner, GA
    Crum, T
    Howell, J
    DeCato, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2001, 11 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [9] BABOR TF, IN PRESS J CONSULTIN
  • [10] Brown S. A., 1994, APPLIED PREVENTIVE P, V3, P61, DOI [10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80139-8, DOI 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80139-8]