Alternative interpretations - Valid or not?

被引：29

作者：

Corbin, JM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] San Jose State Univ, Dept Nursing, Sch Nursing, San Jose, CA 95114 USA

来源：

THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY | 1998年 / 8卷 / 01期

关键词：

experience; grounded theory; macro-analysis;

D O I：

10.1177/0959354398081007

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

This paper attempts to clarify the divisions that have emerged in interpretations of grounded theory following the publication of Strauss and Corbin's Basics of Qualitative Research (1990). In particular I examine our use of the term 'experience', our meaning of 'hypothesis testing', the integration of macro-conditions into the analysis, and the relation of structure to process. I conclude by quoting from a memo written by Strauss concerning these issues in our own and Glaser's work.

引用

页码：121 / 128

页数：8

共 18 条

[1]

Altheide D.L., 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research, V2nd, P485

[2]

[Anonymous], 1992, EMERGENCE VERSUS FOR

[3]

Corbin J., 1996, QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, V2, P139, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780049600200201

[4]

Denzin N., 1997, Interpretive Ethnography

[5]

Dey Ian., 2005, Qualitative data analysis: a user-friendly guide for social scientists

[6]

Feldman M., 1995, STRATEGIES INTERPRET

[7]

Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory Chicago, V4th

[8]

Glaser B.G., 1968, Time for dying

[9]

Glaser Barney, 1965, Awareness of Dying

[10]

Isbell WH, 2006, ANDEAN ARCHAEOLOGY III: NORTH AND SOUTH, P3, DOI 10.1007/0-387-28940-2_1

← 1 2 →