Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sensitivity of integral computer-aided detection with full-field digital mammography for detection of breast cancer according to different histopathological tumor types and appearances
    K Pinker
    N Perry
    S Milner
    K Mokbel
    S Duffy
    Breast Cancer Research, 12
  • [42] Breast Cancer: Missed Interval and Screening-detected Cancer at Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography-Results from a Retrospective Review
    Hoff, Solveig R.
    Abrahamsen, Anne-Line
    Samset, Jon Helge
    Vigeland, Einar
    Klepp, Olbjorn
    Hofvind, Solveig
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 264 (02) : 378 - 386
  • [43] Needle localization for excisional biopsy of breast lesions: Comparison of effect of use of full-field digital versus screen-film mammographic guidance on procedure time
    Yang, WT
    Whitman, GJ
    Johnson, MM
    Bolanos-Clark, M
    Kushwaha, AC
    Hunt, KK
    Dempsey, PJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (01) : 277 - 281
  • [44] Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: A detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading
    Cawson, J. N.
    Nickson, C.
    Amos, A.
    Hill, G.
    Whan, A. B.
    Kavanagh, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (05) : 442 - 449
  • [45] Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Mendel, Kayla
    Li, Hui
    Sheth, Deepa
    Giger, Maryellen
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 735 - 743
  • [46] Conspicuity of breast cancer according to histopathological type and breast density when imaged by full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography
    Katja Pinker
    Nicholas Perry
    S. Vinnicombe
    S. Shiel
    M. Weber
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 18 - 25
  • [47] Conspicuity of breast cancer according to histopathological type and breast density when imaged by full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography
    Pinker, Katja
    Perry, Nicholas
    Vinnicombe, S.
    Shiel, S.
    Weber, M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [48] Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis
    Farber, Rachel
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Wortley, Sally
    Jacklyn, Gemma
    Marinovich, Michael L.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Bell, Katy
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [49] Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    Nakashima, Kazuaki
    Harada, Taiyo Leopoldo
    Nasu, Hatsuko
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 41 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [50] Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting
    Takayoshi Uematsu
    Kazuaki Nakashima
    Taiyo Leopoldo Harada
    Hatsuko Nasu
    Tatsuya Igarashi
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2023, 41 : 63 - 70