Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Ishiyama, Mitsutomi
    Tsunoda-Shimizu, Hiroko
    Kikuchi, Mari
    Saida, Yukihisa
    Hiramatsu, Sonoe
    BREAST CANCER, 2009, 16 (01) : 58 - 61
  • [42] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Per Skaane
    Felix Diekmann
    Corinne Balleyguier
    Susanne Diekmann
    Jean-Charles Piguet
    Kari Young
    Michael Abdelnoor
    Loren Niklason
    European Radiology, 2008, 18
  • [43] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Skaane, Per
    Diekmann, Felix
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Diekmann, Susanne
    Piguet, Jean-Charles
    Young, Kari
    Abdelnoor, Michael
    Niklason, Loren
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 1134 - 1143
  • [44] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Mitsutomi Ishiyama
    Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu
    Mari Kikuchi
    Yukihisa Saida
    Sonoe Hiramatsu
    Breast Cancer, 2009, 16 : 58 - 61
  • [45] Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms
    Ge, Jun
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Wei, Jun
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (08) : 2975 - 2988
  • [46] Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on full-field digital mammograms: A two-view information fusion scheme for FP reduction
    Ge, Jun
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Wei, Jun
    Zhang, Yiheng
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2006, 6144
  • [47] Studies Comparing Screen-Film Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Review
    Skaane, P.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [48] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY VERSUS SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING
    Hipolito, C.
    Gallegos, V
    Hernandez, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [49] PATIENT DOSES FROM SCREEN-FILM AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN A POPULATION-BASED SCREENING PROGRAMME
    Hauge, I. H. R.
    Pedersen, K.
    Sanderud, A.
    Hofvind, S.
    Olerud, H. M.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 148 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [50] Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: Detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories
    Obenauer, S
    Sohns, C
    Werner, C
    Grabbe, E
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (01): : 16 - 19