Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography
    Li, LH
    Clark, RA
    Thomas, JA
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [32] Application of computer-aided diagnosis to full-field digital mammography
    Yarusso, LM
    Nishikawa, RM
    Papaioannou, J
    Nagel, R
    Jokich, P
    Venta, LA
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 421 - 426
  • [33] Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom national breast screening program
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Astley, Susan M.
    McGee, Magnus A.
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Boggis, Caroline R. M.
    Griffiths, Pamela M.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [34] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [35] Breast mass classification on full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography
    Shi, Jiazheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Wei, Jun
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 371 - 377
  • [36] Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography
    Roy J. P. Weber
    Rob M. G. van Bommel
    Marieke W. Louwman
    Joost Nederend
    Adri C. Voogd
    Frits H. Jansen
    Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
    Lucien E. M. Duijm
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 158 : 471 - 483
  • [37] Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography
    Weber, Roy J. P.
    van Bommel, Rob M. G.
    Louwman, Marieke W.
    Nederend, Joost
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Jansen, Frits H.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (03) : 471 - 483
  • [38] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [39] Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers
    Sadaf, Arifa
    Crystal, Pavel
    Scaranelo, Anabel
    Helbich, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (03) : 457 - 461
  • [40] Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: Sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Im, Jung-Gi
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (01) : 71 - 80