Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonardi, Rita
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Houssami, Nehmat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [22] Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results
    F. Baum
    U. Fischer
    S. Obenauer
    E. Grabbe
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 3015 - 3017
  • [23] Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results
    Baum, F
    Fischer, U
    Obenauer, S
    Grabbe, E
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (12) : 3015 - 3017
  • [24] Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Silvia Obenauer
    Christian Sohns
    Carola Werner
    Eckhardt Grabbe
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2006, 19
  • [25] Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography
    Obenauer, Silvia
    Sohns, Christian
    Werner, Carola
    Grabbe, Eckhardt
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2006, 19 (03) : 258 - 263
  • [26] Detection of Breast Cancer with a Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Murakami, Ryusuke
    Kumita, Shinichiro
    Tani, Hitomi
    Yoshida, Tamiko
    Sugizaki, Kenichi
    Kuwako, Tomoyuki
    Kiriyama, Tomonari
    Hakozaki, Kenta
    Okazaki, Emi
    Yanagihara, Keiko
    Iida, Shinya
    Haga, Shunsuke
    Tsuchiya, Shinichi
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (04) : 768 - 773
  • [27] Detection of Breast Cancer with a Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Ryusuke Murakami
    Shinichiro Kumita
    Hitomi Tani
    Tamiko Yoshida
    Kenichi Sugizaki
    Tomoyuki Kuwako
    Tomonari Kiriyama
    Kenta Hakozaki
    Emi Okazaki
    Keiko Yanagihara
    Shinya Iida
    Shunsuke Haga
    Shinichi Tsuchiya
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26 : 768 - 773
  • [28] Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations
    Lewin, JM
    Hendrick, RE
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Moss, LJ
    Karellas, A
    Sisney, GA
    Kuni, CC
    Cutter, GR
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 873 - 880
  • [29] Low-contrast lesion detection: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography
    Hendrick, RE
    Berns, E
    Chorbajian, B
    Choi, K
    Lewin, JM
    Sisney, GA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 569 - 569
  • [30] Causes of differences between full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography interpretations in the Colorado/Massachusetts full-field digital mammography screening trial
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, P
    Moss, LJ
    Hendrick, RE
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 199 - 199