Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: Detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories
    Obenauer, S
    Sohns, C
    Werner, C
    Grabbe, E
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (01) : 16 - 19
  • [22] Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists
    Frank J. H. M. van den Biggelaar
    Alphons G. H. Kessels
    Jos M. A. van Engelshoven
    Carla Boetes
    Karin Flobbe
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 120 : 499 - 506
  • [23] Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
    Azavedo, Edward
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Mejare, Ingegerd
    Arnlind, Marianne Heibert
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
  • [24] Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
    Edward Azavedo
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Ingegerd Mejàre
    Marianne Heibert Arnlind
    BMC Medical Imaging, 12
  • [25] Who could benefit the most from using a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography?
    Na Young Jung
    Bong Joo Kang
    Hyeon Sook Kim
    Eun Suk Cha
    Jae Hee Lee
    Chang Suk Park
    In Young Whang
    Sung Hun Kim
    Yeong Yi An
    Jae Jeong Choi
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12
  • [26] Features of Prospectively Overlooked Computer-Aided Detection Marks on Prior Screening Digital Mammograms in Women With Breast Cancer
    Cho, Nariya
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Choi, Hye Young
    Lyou, Chae Yeon
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (05) : 1276 - 1282
  • [27] Detection of Breast Cancer in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Groups Using Computer-Aided Detection with Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Park, Chang Suk
    Jung, Na Young
    Kim, Kijun
    Jung, Hyun Seouk
    Sohn, Kyung-Myung
    Oh, Se Jeong
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2013, 16 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [28] SCREEN-FILM VERSUS FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY: RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN A LARGE TEACHING HOSPITAL
    Stantic, Tomislav J.
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera E.
    Stojanovic, Saida S.
    Basta-Nikolic, Marijana D.
    Arandjic, Danijela D.
    Stoiljkovic, Dragana S.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2013, 28 (04) : 398 - 405
  • [29] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Grabbe, EH
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2188 - 2191
  • [30] Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Souza, Fabiano H.
    Wendland, Eliana M.
    Rosa, Maria I.
    Polanczyk, Carisi A.
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (03) : 217 - 224