Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: Comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Wei, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Ge, Jun
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Paramagul, Chintana
    Zhang, Yiheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 659 - 669
  • [2] Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms
    Vega Bolivar, Alfonso
    Sanchez Gomez, Sonia
    Merino, Paula
    Alonso-Bartolome, Pilar
    Ortega Garcia, Estrella
    Munoz Cacho, Pedro
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (10) : 1086 - 1092
  • [3] Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms: A fully automated computer-aided system
    Basile, T. M. A.
    Fanizzi, A.
    Losurdo, L.
    Bellotti, R.
    Bottigli, U.
    Dentamaro, R.
    Didonna, V
    Fausto, A.
    Massafra, R.
    Moschetta, M.
    Tamborra, P.
    Tangaro, S.
    La Forgia, D.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 64 : 1 - 9
  • [4] Detection of Breast Cancer with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Computer-Aided Detection
    The, Juliette S.
    Schilling, Kathy J.
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    Friedmann, Euvondia
    McGinnis, Ryan
    Holcomb, Richard G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (02) : 337 - 340
  • [5] Screening mammography detected cancers: Sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms
    Yang, Sang Kyu
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Im, Jung-Gi
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) : 104 - 111
  • [6] Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: Review of 231,221 mammograms
    Gromet, Matthew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 854 - 859
  • [7] Influence of signal-to-noise ratio and temporal stability on computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications in digitized screen-film and full-field digital mammography
    Yarusso, Laura M.
    Nishikawa, Robert M.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
  • [8] Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonardi, Rita
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Houssami, Nehmat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [9] Automatic Detection of the Nipple in Screen-Film and Full-field Digital Mammograms Using a Novel Hessian-Based Method
    Casti, Paola
    Mencattini, Arianna
    Salmeri, Marcello
    Ancona, Antonietta
    Mangieri, Fabio Felice
    Pepe, Maria Luisa
    Rangayyan, Rangaraj Mandayam
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (05) : 948 - 957
  • [10] Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review
    S Ciatto
    M Rosselli Del Turco
    P Burke
    C Visioli
    E Paci
    M Zappa
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 89 : 1645 - 1649