Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
|
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training
    Kallenberg, Michiel
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (23): : 6879 - 6891
  • [2] Computer-Aided Detection with Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography
    Melton, A. R.
    Worrell, S. W.
    Knapp, J.
    Hoffmeister, J. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [3] Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: Comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Wei, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Ge, Jun
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Wu, Yi-Ta
    Paramagul, Chintana
    Zhang, Yiheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 659 - 669
  • [4] Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms
    Ge, Jun
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Wei, Jun
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04): : 981 - 1000
  • [5] Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms
    Vega Bolivar, Alfonso
    Sanchez Gomez, Sonia
    Merino, Paula
    Alonso-Bartolome, Pilar
    Ortega Garcia, Estrella
    Munoz Cacho, Pedro
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (10) : 1086 - 1092
  • [6] Computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer on full field digital and screening film mammograms
    Sun, XJ
    Qian, W
    Song, XS
    Qian, YY
    Song, DS
    Clark, RA
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 930 - 939
  • [7] Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms: A fully automated computer-aided system
    Basile, T. M. A.
    Fanizzi, A.
    Losurdo, L.
    Bellotti, R.
    Bottigli, U.
    Dentamaro, R.
    Didonna, V
    Fausto, A.
    Massafra, R.
    Moschetta, M.
    Tamborra, P.
    Tangaro, S.
    La Forgia, D.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 64 : 1 - 9
  • [8] Screening mammography detected cancers: Sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms
    Yang, Sang Kyu
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Im, Jung-Gi
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) : 104 - 111
  • [9] Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms
    Karssemeijer, N
    Otten, JDM
    Verbeek, ALM
    Groenewoud, JH
    de Koning, HJ
    Hendriks, JHCL
    Holland, R
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (01) : 192 - 200
  • [10] Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment
    Zheng, B.
    Sumkin, J. H.
    Zuley, M. L.
    Lederman, D.
    Wang, X.
    Gur, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1014): : E153 - E161