Factors influencing the selection of the motor carrier for an agri-food product: The case of the table olive

被引:0
作者
Caro-Vela, M. D. [1 ]
Ramirez-Hurtado, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pablo Olavide, Fac Ciencias Empresariales, Seville 41013, Spain
来源
ITEA-INFORMACION TECNICA ECONOMICA AGRARIA | 2014年 / 110卷 / 03期
关键词
Table olive; motor carrier; transport; preferences; conjoint analysis; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION CHOICE; SHIPPER PERCEPTIONS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; STATED PREFERENCES; SERVICE-SELECTION; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; ATTRIBUTES; MODE; DETERMINANTS; DEREGULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The table olive industry plays an important role in international trade. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the preferences of exporters about carrier attributes. Specifically, this study tries to identify the carrier profile preferred by exporters of table olive. The carrier profile is obtained using a methodology that is rarely used in this field: conjoint analysis. The choice of carrier is an important problem because there is a high heterogeneity in the transport service. This study, unlike most others, concentrates on one form of transport, that of the road, and on a concrete and peculiar product, the table olive. The results show that the most important attribute preferred by exporters of table olives is reliability, that is, the ability for make on-time deliveries. The second factor in order of important is the cost. On the other hand, the least valued factors are those associated with the image of the carrier, such as reputation and experience. The conclusions of this study try to contribute to the improvement of the carrier selection, focussing on the table olive industry.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 281
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Acito F, 1977, 1977 ED P AM MARK AS
  • [2] [Anonymous], HB TRANSPORT
  • [3] Azpiazu J, 1996, THESIS U AUTONOMA MA
  • [4] BAKER GH, 1984, TRANSPORT J, V24, P20
  • [5] Bakker S, 2004, HET GOEDEREN VERVOER
  • [6] BARDI EJ, 1973, TRANSPORT J, V13, P23
  • [7] BERGKVIST E, 1998, UMEA EC STUDIES, V488
  • [8] Beuthe M, 2008, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V42, P105
  • [9] CETMO, 2000, NEC CARG RESP TRANSP
  • [10] CHOW G, 1984, LOGIST TRANSPORT REV, V20, P25