Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: The relationship to social capital

被引:171
作者
Runyan, DK
Hunter, WM
Socolar, RRS
Amaya-Jackson, L
English, D
Landsverk, J
Dubowitz, H
Browne, DH
Bangdiwala, SI
Mathew, RM
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Social Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Washington State Dept Social & Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA USA
[7] San Diego State Univ, Sch Social Work, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
social capital; social networks; child well-being; development; resilience; child maltreatment;
D O I
10.1542/peds.101.1.12
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. Social capital describes the benefits that are derived from personal social relationships (within families and communities) and social affiliations. This investigation examined the extent to which social capital is associated with positive developmental and behavioral outcomes in high-risk preschool children. Design. A cross-sectional case-control analysis of young children "doing well" and "not doing well" at baseline in four coordinated longitudinal studies. Participants. A total of 667 2- to 5-year-old children (mean age, 4.4 years) and their maternal caregivers who are participating in the Longitudinal Studies of Chile: Abuse and Neglect Consortium. At recruitment, all children were characterized by unfavorable social or economic circumstances that contributed to the identification of the children as high risk. Measures. Social capital was defined as benefits that accrue from social relationships within communities and families. A social capital index was created by assigning one point to each of the following indicators: I) two parents or parent-figures in the home; 2) social support of the maternal caregiver 3) no more than two children in the family; 4) neighborhood support; and 5) regular church attendance. Outcomes were measured with the Child Behavior Checklist, a widely used measure of behavioral/emotional problems, and with the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test; a standardized test that identifies developmental deficits. Children were classified as doing well if their scares on these instruments indicated neither behavioral nor developmental problems. Results. Only 13% of the children were classified as doing well. The individual indicators that best discriminated between levels of child functioning were the most direct measures of social capital-church affiliation, perception of personal social support, and support within the neighborhood. The social capital index was strongly associated with child well-being, more so than any single indicator. The presence of any social capital indicator increased the odds of doing well by 29%; adding any two increased the odds of doing well by 66%. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that social capital may have an impact on children's well-being as early as the preschool years. In these years it seems to be the parents' social capital that confers benefits on their off-spring, just as children benefit from their parents' financial and human capital. Social capital may be most crucial far families who have fewer financial and educational resources. Our findings suggest that those interested in the healthy development of children, particularly children most at risk for poor developmental outcomes, must search for new and creative ways of supporting interpersonal relationships and strengthening the communities in which families carry out the daily activities of their lives.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Achenbach T. M, 1991, Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, AM J SOCIOL, DOI DOI 10.1086/228943
[3]  
Bavolek SJ, 1979, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V3, P1071, DOI DOI 10.1016/0145-2134(79)90152-2
[4]   ACCESS TO SOCIAL CAPITAL [J].
BOISJOLY, J ;
DUNCAN, GJ ;
HOFFERTH, S .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 1995, 16 (05) :609-631
[5]  
BROADHEAD W, 1988, MED CARE, V27, P221
[6]  
GARBARINO J, 1980, CHILD DEV, V51, P188, DOI 10.2307/1129606
[7]  
KORBIN J, 1995, NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
[8]  
Newborg J., 1984, BATTELLE DEV INVENTO
[9]   FAMILY SOCIAL CAPITAL AND CHILDRENS BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS [J].
PARCEL, TL ;
MENAGHAN, EG .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1993, 56 (02) :120-135
[10]   LOGISTIC DISEASE INCIDENCE MODELS AND CASE-CONTROL STUDIES [J].
PRENTICE, RL ;
PYKE, R .
BIOMETRIKA, 1979, 66 (03) :403-411