Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:81
|
作者
Park, D. A. [1 ]
Yun, J. E. [1 ]
Kim, S. W. [3 ]
Lee, S. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Evidence Based Healthcare Collaborating Agcy, Hlth Technol Assessment Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Nursing Sci, Coll Nursing, 191 Hambakmoero, Incheon 406799, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EJSO | 2017年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词
Cervical cancer; Robotic hysterectomy; Radical hysterectomy; Open hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; OPEN RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH versus LH and laparotomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through May 2015, and checked references of relevant studies. We selected the comparative studies reported the surgical safety (overall; peri-operative; and post-operative complications; death within 30 days; and specific morbidities), and clinical effectiveness (survival; recurrence; length of stay [LOS]; estimated blood loss [EBL]; operative time [OT]) and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies comparing RH with OH and 11 comparing RH with LH were identified. No significant differences were found in survival outcomes. The LOS was shorter and transfusion rate was lower with RH compared to OH or LH. EBL was significantly reduced with RH compared to OH. Compared to OH, overall complications, urinary infection, wound infection, and fever were significantly less frequent with RH. The overall, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were similar in other comparisons. Several patient-reported outcomes were improved with RH, though each outcome was reported in only one study. Conclusions: RH appears to have a positive effect in reducing overall complications, individual adverse events including wound infection, fever, urinary tract infection, transfusion, LOS, EBL, and time to diet than OH for cervical cancer patients. Compared to LH, the current evidence is not enough to clearly determine its clinical safety and effectiveness. Further rigorous prospective studies with long-term follow-up that overcome the many limitations of the current evidence are needed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Cui, Yongzhen
    Li, Cheng
    Xu, Zhongfa
    Wang, Yingming
    Sun, Yamei
    Xu, Huirong
    Li, Zengjun
    Sun, Yanlai
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 : 1247 - 1257
  • [42] Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Henriksen, N. A.
    Jensen, K. K.
    Muysoms, F.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [43] Meta-analysis of Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Ohtani, Hiroshi
    Maeda, Kiyoshi
    Nomura, Shinya
    Shinto, Osamu
    Mizuyama, Yoko
    Nakagawa, Hiroji
    Nagahara, Hisashi
    Shibutani, Masatsune
    Fukuoka, Tatsunari
    Amano, Ryosuke
    Hirakawa, Kosei
    Ohira, Masaichi
    IN VIVO, 2018, 32 (03): : 611 - 623
  • [44] Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Banghyun
    Kim, Kidong
    Park, Youngmi
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    Bristow, Robert E.
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (49)
  • [45] Effectiveness of acupuncture on urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Yong
    Pan, Haixia
    Chen, Siyang
    Tian, Minne
    Huang, Yanmei
    Zhou, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [46] Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction
    Wu, Jiayue
    Ye, Taiyang
    Lv, Jianwei
    He, Zhihong
    Zhu, Jie
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 417 - +
  • [47] Surgical Complications and Hospital Costs in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database
    Andiman, Sarah E.
    Bui, Anthony H.
    Ascher-Walsh, Charles
    Wright, Jason D.
    Xu, Xiao
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (05): : E142 - E148
  • [48] Robot-assisted versus open hepatectomy for liver tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xue, Qian
    Wu, Jianping
    Lei, Zehua
    Wang, Qing
    Fu, Jinqiang
    Gao, Fengwei
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (03) : 282 - 288
  • [49] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mederos, Michael A.
    de Virgilio, Michael J.
    Shenoy, Rivfka
    Ye, Linda
    Toste, Paul A.
    Mak, Selene S.
    Booth, Marika S.
    Begashaw, Meron M.
    Wilson, Mark
    Gunnar, William
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    Girgis, Mark D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (11) : E2129228
  • [50] A systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation: comparative insights with conventional techniques
    Dashtkoohi, Mohammad
    Ashtari, Sara
    Delbari, Pouria
    Mehrabi, Mohammad Mahdi
    Karimi, Amirmasoud
    Kakoienejad, Mohammad Mahdi
    Khaboushan, Alireza Soltani
    Ohadi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)