Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:81
|
作者
Park, D. A. [1 ]
Yun, J. E. [1 ]
Kim, S. W. [3 ]
Lee, S. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Evidence Based Healthcare Collaborating Agcy, Hlth Technol Assessment Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Nursing Sci, Coll Nursing, 191 Hambakmoero, Incheon 406799, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EJSO | 2017年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词
Cervical cancer; Robotic hysterectomy; Radical hysterectomy; Open hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; OPEN RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH versus LH and laparotomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through May 2015, and checked references of relevant studies. We selected the comparative studies reported the surgical safety (overall; peri-operative; and post-operative complications; death within 30 days; and specific morbidities), and clinical effectiveness (survival; recurrence; length of stay [LOS]; estimated blood loss [EBL]; operative time [OT]) and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies comparing RH with OH and 11 comparing RH with LH were identified. No significant differences were found in survival outcomes. The LOS was shorter and transfusion rate was lower with RH compared to OH or LH. EBL was significantly reduced with RH compared to OH. Compared to OH, overall complications, urinary infection, wound infection, and fever were significantly less frequent with RH. The overall, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were similar in other comparisons. Several patient-reported outcomes were improved with RH, though each outcome was reported in only one study. Conclusions: RH appears to have a positive effect in reducing overall complications, individual adverse events including wound infection, fever, urinary tract infection, transfusion, LOS, EBL, and time to diet than OH for cervical cancer patients. Compared to LH, the current evidence is not enough to clearly determine its clinical safety and effectiveness. Further rigorous prospective studies with long-term follow-up that overcome the many limitations of the current evidence are needed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
    Marchand, Greg
    Masoud, Ahmed Taher
    Abdelsattar, Ahmed
    King, Alexa
    Brazil, Giovanna
    Ulibarri, Hollie
    Parise, Julia
    Arroyo, Amanda
    Coriell, Catherine
    Goetz, Sydnee
    Moir, Carmen
    Baruelo, Geneva
    Govindan, Malini
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 289 : 190 - 202
  • [22] Comparison of conventional laparoscopy and robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Hao Xianhua
    Han Shuzhai
    Wang Yunfei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (08) : 258 - 264
  • [23] Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Nida
    Massaad, Elie
    Hadzipasic, Muhamed
    Shankar, Ganesh M.
    Shin, John H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis
    Sheng, Yannan
    Hong, Ziqiang
    Wang, Jian
    Mao, Baohong
    Wu, Zhenzhen
    Gou, Yunjiu
    Zhao, Jing
    Liu, Qing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [25] Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rondelli, F.
    Bugiantella, W.
    Villa, F.
    Sanguinetti, A.
    Boni, M.
    Mariani, E.
    Avenia, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 : S153 - S159
  • [26] Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Approach for Splenectomy in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghidini, Filippo
    Bisoffi, Silvia
    Gamba, Piergiorgio
    Fascetti Leon, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (11): : 1203 - 1210
  • [27] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair
    Hassanabad, Ali Fatehi
    Nagase, Fernanda N. I.
    Basha, Ameen M.
    Hammal, Fadi
    Menon, Devidas
    Kent, William D. T.
    Ali, Imtiaz S.
    Nagendran, Jeevan
    Stafinski, Tania
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 17 (06) : 471 - 481
  • [28] Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Louis Lenfant
    Geoffroy Canlorbe
    Jérémie Belghiti
    Usha Seshadri Kreaden
    April E. Hebert
    Marianne Nikpayam
    Catherine Uzan
    Henri Azaïs
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 2647 - 2662
  • [29] Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niu, Xiangdong
    Yu, Bin
    Yao, Liang
    Tian, Jinhui
    Guo, Tiankang
    Ma, Shixun
    Cai, Hui
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 32 - 45
  • [30] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1
    Kim, Sang Il
    Yoo, Ji Geun
    Lee, Sung Jong
    Park, Dong Choon
    Yoon, Joo Hee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 20 (03): : 287 - 291