Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:83
作者
Park, D. A. [1 ]
Yun, J. E. [1 ]
Kim, S. W. [3 ]
Lee, S. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Evidence Based Healthcare Collaborating Agcy, Hlth Technol Assessment Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Nursing Sci, Coll Nursing, 191 Hambakmoero, Incheon 406799, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EJSO | 2017年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词
Cervical cancer; Robotic hysterectomy; Radical hysterectomy; Open hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; OPEN RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH versus LH and laparotomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through May 2015, and checked references of relevant studies. We selected the comparative studies reported the surgical safety (overall; peri-operative; and post-operative complications; death within 30 days; and specific morbidities), and clinical effectiveness (survival; recurrence; length of stay [LOS]; estimated blood loss [EBL]; operative time [OT]) and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies comparing RH with OH and 11 comparing RH with LH were identified. No significant differences were found in survival outcomes. The LOS was shorter and transfusion rate was lower with RH compared to OH or LH. EBL was significantly reduced with RH compared to OH. Compared to OH, overall complications, urinary infection, wound infection, and fever were significantly less frequent with RH. The overall, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were similar in other comparisons. Several patient-reported outcomes were improved with RH, though each outcome was reported in only one study. Conclusions: RH appears to have a positive effect in reducing overall complications, individual adverse events including wound infection, fever, urinary tract infection, transfusion, LOS, EBL, and time to diet than OH for cervical cancer patients. Compared to LH, the current evidence is not enough to clearly determine its clinical safety and effectiveness. Further rigorous prospective studies with long-term follow-up that overcome the many limitations of the current evidence are needed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1002
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[3]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[4]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[5]   Comparing Robotic Surgery With Conventional Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Cervical Cancer Management [J].
Chen, Ching-Hui ;
Chiu, Li-Hsuan ;
Chang, Ching-Wen ;
Yen, Yuan-Kuei ;
Huang, Yan-Hua ;
Liu, Wei-Min .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (06) :1105-1111
[6]   Robotics and Gynecologic Oncology: Review of the Literature [J].
Cho, Jennifer E. ;
Nezhat, Farr R. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :669-681
[7]   Robot Versus Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer A Comparison of the Intraoperative and Perioperative Results of a Single Surgeon's Initial Experience [J].
Chong, Gun Oh ;
Lee, Yoon Hee ;
Hong, Dae Gy ;
Cho, Young Lae ;
Park, Il Soo ;
Lee, Yoon Soon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (06) :1145-1149
[8]   Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer [J].
Desille-Gbaguidi, H. ;
Hebert, T. ;
Paternotte-Villemagne, J. ;
Gaborit, C. ;
Rush, E. ;
Body, G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 171 (02) :348-352
[9]   A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].
Estape, Ricardo ;
Lambrou, Nicholas ;
Diaz, Robert ;
Estape, Eric ;
Dunkin, Natalie ;
Rivera, Angel .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) :357-361
[10]   Systematic Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Robotic Techniques Compared With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy [J].
Gala, Rajiv B. ;
Margulies, Rebecca ;
Steinberg, Adam ;
Murphy, Miles ;
Lukban, James ;
Jeppson, Peter ;
Aschkenazi, Sarit ;
Olivera, Cedric ;
South, Mary ;
Lowenstein, Lior ;
Schaffer, Joseph ;
Balk, Ethan M. ;
Sung, Vivian .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) :353-361