Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:81
|
作者
Park, D. A. [1 ]
Yun, J. E. [1 ]
Kim, S. W. [3 ]
Lee, S. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Evidence Based Healthcare Collaborating Agcy, Hlth Technol Assessment Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Nursing Sci, Coll Nursing, 191 Hambakmoero, Incheon 406799, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EJSO | 2017年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词
Cervical cancer; Robotic hysterectomy; Radical hysterectomy; Open hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; OPEN RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COST; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH versus LH and laparotomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through May 2015, and checked references of relevant studies. We selected the comparative studies reported the surgical safety (overall; peri-operative; and post-operative complications; death within 30 days; and specific morbidities), and clinical effectiveness (survival; recurrence; length of stay [LOS]; estimated blood loss [EBL]; operative time [OT]) and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies comparing RH with OH and 11 comparing RH with LH were identified. No significant differences were found in survival outcomes. The LOS was shorter and transfusion rate was lower with RH compared to OH or LH. EBL was significantly reduced with RH compared to OH. Compared to OH, overall complications, urinary infection, wound infection, and fever were significantly less frequent with RH. The overall, peri-operative, and post-operative complications were similar in other comparisons. Several patient-reported outcomes were improved with RH, though each outcome was reported in only one study. Conclusions: RH appears to have a positive effect in reducing overall complications, individual adverse events including wound infection, fever, urinary tract infection, transfusion, LOS, EBL, and time to diet than OH for cervical cancer patients. Compared to LH, the current evidence is not enough to clearly determine its clinical safety and effectiveness. Further rigorous prospective studies with long-term follow-up that overcome the many limitations of the current evidence are needed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, D. A.
    Lee, D. H.
    Kim, S. W.
    Lee, S. H.
    EJSO, 2016, 42 (09): : 1303 - 1314
  • [2] Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Neill, Michelle
    Moran, Patrick S.
    Teljeur, Conor
    O'Sullivan, Orfhlaith E.
    O'Reilly, Barry A.
    Hewitt, Matt
    Flattery, Martin
    Ryan, Mairin
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (05) : 907 - 918
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of robotic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis
    Dai, Zhen
    Qin, Fuqiang
    Yang, Yuxing
    Liang, Weiming
    Wang, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [4] A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants
    Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
    Babu, Ramesh
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (04) : 502 - 510
  • [5] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic major hepatectomies: Systematic review with meta-analysis
    Coletta, Diego
    Sandri, Giovanni Battista Levi
    Giuliani, Giuseppe
    Guerra, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (03)
  • [6] Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Weimin
    Cao, Dongyan
    Yang, Jiaxin
    Shen, Keng
    Zhao, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 142 (10) : 2173 - 2183
  • [7] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moran, Patrick S.
    O'Neill, Michelle
    Teljeur, Conor
    Flattery, Martin
    Murphy, Linda A.
    Smyth, Gordon
    Ryan, Mairin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 312 - 321
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Pan, Ke
    Zhang, Yao
    Wang, Yanzhou
    Wang, Yunle
    Xu, Huicheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 132 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [9] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Greenwald, David
    Mohanty, Amrita
    Andolfi, Ciro
    Gundeti, Mohan S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 448 - 461
  • [10] Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Yue
    Hang, Bo
    Xiong, Guang-Wu
    Zhang, Xiao-Wei
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (11): : 1132 - 1144