Decision aids and breast cancer: Do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options?

被引:194
作者
Waljee, Jennifer F.
Rogers, Mary A. M.
Alderman, Amy K.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Sect Gen Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Sect Plast Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Gen Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5472
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To describe the effect of decision aids on the choice for surgery and knowledge of surgical therapy among women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods A systematic review was conducted between years 1966 to 2006 of all studies designed to assess the effect of decision aids on surgical therapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), the Cochrane Network, HAPI databases, and bibliographies were searched. Of the 123 studies screened, 11 studies met criteria. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the pooled relative risk for surgical choice and the pooled mean difference in patient knowledge. Results Results from randomized controlled trials indicated that women who used a decision aid were 25% more likely to choose breast-conserving surgery over mastectomy (risk ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.40). Decision aids significantly increased patient knowledge by 24% (P = .024). The data also suggested that decision aids decreased decisional conflict and increased satisfaction with the decision-making process. Decision aids were well received by surgeons and patients, facilitated patients' desire for shared decision making, and were feasible to implement into practice. Conclusion Decision aids are important adjuncts for counseling women with early-stage breast cancer. Their use increases the likelihood that women will choose breast-conserving surgery, and enhances patient knowledge of treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1073
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer [J].
Lantz, PM ;
Janz, NK ;
Fagerlin, A ;
Schwartz, K ;
Liu, LH ;
Lakhani, I ;
Salem, B ;
Katz, SJ .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :745-767
[22]   Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study [J].
Molenaar, S ;
Oort, F ;
Sprangers, M ;
Rutgers, E ;
Luiten, E ;
Mulder, J ;
de Haes, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (11) :2123-2130
[23]   Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: Effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life [J].
Molenaar, S ;
Sprangers, MAG ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Luiten, EJT ;
Mulder, J ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
van Everdingen, JJE ;
Oosterveld, P ;
de Haes, HCJM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1676-1687
[24]  
Molenaar S, 2001, NED TIJDSCHR GENEES, V145, P1004
[25]  
Nattinger, 1994, Cancer Control, V1, P334
[26]   The effect of legislative requirements on the use of breast-conserving surgery [J].
Nattinger, AB ;
Hoffmann, RG ;
Shapiro, R ;
Gottlieb, MS ;
Goodwin, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (14) :1035-1040
[27]   GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION IN THE USE OF BREAST-CONSERVING TREATMENT FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
NATTINGER, AB ;
GOTTLIEB, MS ;
VEUM, J ;
YAHNKE, D ;
GOODWIN, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (17) :1102-1107
[28]  
O'Connor A M, 1999, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P67
[29]   A call to standardize measures for judging the efficacy of interventions to aid patients' decision making [J].
O'Connor, AM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (04) :504-505
[30]   VALIDATION OF A DECISIONAL CONFLICT SCALE [J].
OCONNOR, AM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (01) :25-30